These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1742440)

  • 1. A comparison of several point estimators of the odds ratio in a single 2 x 2 contingency table.
    Walter SD; Cook RJ
    Biometrics; 1991 Sep; 47(3):795-811. PubMed ID: 1742440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(16):3078-94. PubMed ID: 17187347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Small-sample bias of point estimators of the odds ratio from matched sets.
    Jewell NP
    Biometrics; 1984 Jun; 40(2):421-35. PubMed ID: 6487726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of maximum likelihood and Jewell's estimators of the odds ratio and relative risk in single 2 x 2 tables.
    Becker S
    Stat Med; 1989 Aug; 8(8):987-96. PubMed ID: 2799127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of conditional maximum likelihood estimation of a common odds ratio.
    Hauck WW
    Biometrics; 1984 Dec; 40(4):1117-23. PubMed ID: 6534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Small sample estimation of log odds ratios from logistic regression and fourfold tables.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 1985; 4(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 4089348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mantel-Haenszel-type inference for cumulative odds ratios with a stratified ordinal response.
    Liu IM; Agresti A
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1223-34. PubMed ID: 8962452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating sensitivity and bias in a yes/no task.
    Hautus MJ; Lee A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):257-73. PubMed ID: 17067412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accounting for independent nondifferential misclassification does not increase certainty that an observed association is in the correct direction.
    Greenland S; Gustafson P
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 164(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 16641307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of maximum likelihood and Jewell's estimator of the odds ratio and relative risk in single 2 x 2 tables.
    Jewell NP
    Stat Med; 1991 Jan; 10(1):151-3. PubMed ID: 2006353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eight interval estimators of a common rate ratio under stratified Poisson sampling.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1283-96. PubMed ID: 15083483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias reduction for risk ratio and vaccine effect estimators.
    Chick SE; Barth-Jones DC; Koopman JS
    Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(11):1609-24. PubMed ID: 11391691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods of estimation in log odds ratio regression models.
    Breslow NE; Cologne J
    Biometrics; 1986 Dec; 42(4):949-54. PubMed ID: 3814734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A restricted maximum likelihood estimator for truncated height samples.
    A'Hearn B
    Econ Hum Biol; 2004 Mar; 2(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 15463990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Small-sample bias and corrections for conditional maximum-likelihood odds-ratio estimators.
    Greenland S
    Biostatistics; 2000 Mar; 1(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 12933529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the potential of measurement error to induce differential bias on odds ratio estimates: an example from radon epidemiology.
    Heid IM; Küchenhoff H; Wellmann J; Gerken M; Kreienbrock L; Wichmann HE
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3261-78. PubMed ID: 12375303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data.
    Greenland S; Robins JM
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 4005387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the use of concordant pairs in matched case-control studies.
    Liang KY; Zeger SL
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1145-56. PubMed ID: 3233251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.