These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Can eyewitnesses correct for external influences on their lineup identifications? The actual/counterfactual assessment paradigm. Charman SD; Wells GL J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 18377163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups. Wright DB Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eyewitness lineups: is the appearance-change instruction a good idea? Charman SD; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2007 Feb; 31(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 16612580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regularities in eyewitness identification. Clark SE; Howell RT; Davey SL Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):187-218. PubMed ID: 17410411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications. Clark SE; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):406-22. PubMed ID: 18095147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. Semmler C; Brewer N; Wells GL J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):334-46. PubMed ID: 15065979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eyewitness confidence and decision time reflect identification accuracy in actual police lineups. Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 36757968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Post-identification feedback to eyewitnesses impairs evaluators' abilities to discriminate between accurate and mistaken testimony. Smalarz L; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2014 Apr; 38(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 24341835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confirming feedback following a mistaken identification impairs memory for the culprit. Smalarz L; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2014 Jun; 38(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 24707912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Brewer N; Wells GL J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16536656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy. Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis. Wixted JT; Wells GL Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suspect/foil identification in actual crimes and in the laboratory: a reality monitoring analysis. Behrman BW; Richards RE Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):279-301. PubMed ID: 15965629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Field experiments on eyewitness identification: towards a better understanding of pitfalls and prospects. Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2008 Feb; 32(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 17610051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of post-identification feedback, delay, and suspicion on accurate eyewitnesses. Quinlivan DS; Neuschatz JS; Douglass AB; Wells GL; Wetmore SA Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 22667810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]