BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17425633)

  • 1. Cox regression methods for two-stage randomization designs.
    Lokhnygina Y; Helterbrand JD
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):422-8. PubMed ID: 17425633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal estimator for the survival distribution and related quantities for treatment policies in two-stage randomization designs in clinical trials.
    Wahed AS; Tsiatis AA
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 15032782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-stage randomization designs in drug development.
    Wolbers M; Helterbrand JD
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4161-74. PubMed ID: 18570274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size for two-stage studies with maintenance therapy.
    Feng W; Wahed AS
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(15):2028-41. PubMed ID: 19382105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection designs for pilot studies based on survival.
    Liu PY; Dahlberg S; Crowley J
    Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):391-8. PubMed ID: 8369375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method for sequential analysis of survival data with nonproportional hazards.
    Sooriyarachchi MR; Whitehead J
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):1072-84. PubMed ID: 9750253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential monitoring of randomization tests: stratified randomization.
    Zhang Y; Rosenberger WF; Smythe RT
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):865-72. PubMed ID: 17825016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On corrected score approach for proportional hazards model with covariate measurement error.
    Song X; Huang Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16135021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variance identification and efficiency analysis in randomized experiments under the matched-pair design.
    Imai K
    Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):4857-73. PubMed ID: 18618425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of factorial survival experiments.
    Slud EV
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 8086609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bootstrap analysis of multivariate failure time data.
    Monaco J; Cai J; Grizzle J
    Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3387-400. PubMed ID: 16237657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of conditional and unconditional randomization tests for highly stratified designs.
    Flyer PA
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1551-9. PubMed ID: 9883551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of long-term survival: use of diagnostics and robust estimators with Cox's proportional hazards model.
    Valsecchi MG; Silvestri D; Sasieni P
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2763-80. PubMed ID: 8981685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysing sequential events in clinical trials.
    Salter A; Raab G; Day S
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(5):421-30. PubMed ID: 17060216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Weighted Kaplan-Meier estimators for two-stage treatment regimes.
    Miyahara S; Wahed AS
    Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(25):2581-91. PubMed ID: 20799259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intent-to-treat analysis and the problem of crossovers. An example from the Veterans Administration coronary bypass surgery study.
    Peduzzi P; Detre K; Wittes J; Holford T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Mar; 101(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 1999942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regression analysis of doubly censored failure time data using the additive hazards model.
    Sun L; Kim YJ; Sun J
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):637-43. PubMed ID: 15339285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A jackknife estimator of variance for Cox regression for correlated survival data.
    Lipsitz SR; Parzen M
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):291-8. PubMed ID: 8934598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic comparison of Kaplan-Meier proportions: monitoring a randomized clinical trial with a long-term binary endpoint.
    Brittain E; Follmann D; Yang S
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 17680830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.