152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17425830)
1. Prospective randomized comparison of Wallace and Labotect embryo transfer catheters.
Ata B; Isiklar A; Balaban B; Urman B
Reprod Biomed Online; 2007 Apr; 14(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 17425830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing two embryo transfer catheters. Use of a trial transfer to determine the catheter applied.
Urman B; Aksoy S; Alatas C; Mercan R; Nuhoglu A; Isiklar A; Balaban B
J Reprod Med; 2000 Feb; 45(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 10710745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomized controlled trial of Wallace and Rocket embryo transfer catheters.
El-Shawarby SA; Ravhon A; Skull J; Ellenbogen A; Trew G; Lavery S
Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Oct; 17(4):549-52. PubMed ID: 18854110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy of the embryo transfer catheter in IVF and ICSI is operator-dependent: a randomized clinical trial.
Yao Z; Vansteelandt S; Van der Elst J; Coetsier T; Dhont M; De Sutter P
Hum Reprod; 2009 Apr; 24(4):880-7. PubMed ID: 19095665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Embryo Transfers of Cases with and without Catheter Rotation during Its Withdrawal.
Yayla Abide C; Ozkaya E; Sanverdi I; Bostancı Ergen E; Kurek Eken M; Devranoglu B; Bilgiç BE; Kilicci C; Kayatas Eser S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 29758560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Abou-Setta AM; Al-Inany HG; Mansour RT; Serour GI; Aboulghar MA
Hum Reprod; 2005 Nov; 20(11):3114-21. PubMed ID: 16040620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cook versus Edwards-Wallace: are there differences in flexible catheters?
Boone WR; Johnson JE; Blackhurst DM; Crane MM
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2001 Jan; 18(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 11292989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A review and meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing different catheters used for embryo transfer.
Buckett WM
Fertil Steril; 2006 Mar; 85(3):728-34. PubMed ID: 16500345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effect of catheter choice during embryo transfer on the clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer].
Ren XL; Liu P; Lian Y; Huang J; Zheng XY; Zhu YJ; Qiao J
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Oct; 48(5):905-909. PubMed ID: 27752179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis using direct and adjusted indirect comparisons.
Abou-Setta AM
Reprod Biomed Online; 2006 Feb; 12(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 16478584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomized comparison of the Wallace catheter and the Cook Echo-Tip catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer.
Karande V; Hazlett D; Vietzke M; Gleicher N
Fertil Steril; 2002 Apr; 77(4):826-30. PubMed ID: 11937141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of pregnancy rates for two embryo-transfer catheters.
Rhodes TL; Higdon HL; Boone WR
Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):411-6. PubMed ID: 17094973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modern embryo transfer catheters and pregnancy outcome: a prospective randomized trial.
McIlveen M; Lok FD; Pritchard J; Lashen H
Fertil Steril; 2005 Oct; 84(4):996-1000. PubMed ID: 16213855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marked improvement in clinical pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer seen when transfer technique and catheter were changed.
Choe JK; Nazari A; Check JH; Summers-Chase D; Swenson K
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2001; 28(4):223-4. PubMed ID: 11838743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing two embryo transfer catheters in an ART program.
Saldeen P; Abou-Setta AM; Bergh T; Sundström P; Holte J
Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):599-603. PubMed ID: 18054000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Day 4 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a prospective study of clinical outcomes.
Pantos K; Makrakis E; Chronopoulou M; Biba M; Perdikaris A; Dafereras A
Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):573-7. PubMed ID: 17517409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of using an echogenic catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in an IVF programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Coroleu B; Barri PN; Carreras O; Belil I; Buxaderas R; Veiga A; Balasch J
Hum Reprod; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1809-15. PubMed ID: 16556674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Timing of Embryo Transfer Catheter Removal: Should It be Delayed or Done Immediately? A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Devranoğlu B; Özdamar Ö; Çakıroğlu Y; Küçükbaş M; Eken MK; Doğer E
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 28222446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What is a difficult transfer? Analysis of 7,714 embryo transfers: the impact of maneuvers during embryo transfers on pregnancy rate and a proposal of objective assessment.
Kava-Braverman A; Martínez F; Rodríguez I; Álvarez M; Barri PN; Coroleu B
Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):657-663.e1. PubMed ID: 28089573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective, randomized trial on the effect of atmospheric versus reduced oxygen concentration on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.
Kovacic B; Sajko MC; Vlaisavljević V
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jul; 94(2):511-9. PubMed ID: 19409544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
