276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17425905)
1. [Application of the pi* goodness-of-fit index to latent structure models].
Revuelta J; Kessel D
Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 17425905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
Revuelta J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Goodness-of-fit testing using components based on marginal frequencies of multinomial data.
Reiser M
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):331-60. PubMed ID: 17535483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2 tables.
Cai L; Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Thissen D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):173-94. PubMed ID: 16709285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mixture distribution latent state-trait analysis: basic ideas and applications.
Courvoisier DS; Eid M; Nussbeck FW
Psychol Methods; 2007 Mar; 12(1):80-104. PubMed ID: 17402813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.
Templin JL; Henson RA
Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):287-305. PubMed ID: 16953706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the chi-square approximation to the exact distribution of goodness-of-fit statistics in multinomial models with composite hypotheses.
García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón VA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 May; 57(Pt 1):73-96. PubMed ID: 15171802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: potential problems and promising opportunities.
Bauer DJ; Curran PJ
Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 15053717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analyzing the convergent and discriminant validity of states and traits: development and applications of multimethod latent state-trait models.
Courvoisier DS; Nussbeck FW; Eid M; Geiser C; Cole DA
Psychol Assess; 2008 Sep; 20(3):270-80. PubMed ID: 18778163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [How to fit and interpret multilevel models using SPSS].
Pardo A; Ruiz MA; San Martín R
Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):308-21. PubMed ID: 17425904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conditional mixed models with crossed random effects.
Tibaldi FS; Verbeke G; Molenberghs G; Renard D; Van den Noortgate W; de Boeck P
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):351-65. PubMed ID: 17971274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. multiTree: a computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models.
Moshagen M
Behav Res Methods; 2010 Feb; 42(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 20160285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SEM of another flavour: two new applications of the supplemented EM algorithm.
Cai L
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):309-29. PubMed ID: 17971266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testing the fit of a regression model via score tests in random effects models.
le Cessie S; van Houwelingen HC
Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):600-14. PubMed ID: 7662848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006).
Geiser C; Eid M; Nussbeck FW
Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 18331153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian analysis of structural equation models with mixed exponential family and ordered categorical data.
Lee SY; Tang NS
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):151-72. PubMed ID: 16709284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative analysis of three approaches for rater agreement].
Ato M; Benavente A; López JJ
Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):638-45. PubMed ID: 17296098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fixed-distance latent class models for the analysis of sets of two-way contingency tables.
Formann AK
Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):511-21. PubMed ID: 8369385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptive robust estimation and testing.
Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR; Lix LM; Algina J; Fradette K
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):267-93. PubMed ID: 17971270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
