174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17427533)
1. Sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography on detecting abnormal findings of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Boonjunwetwatmd D; Chyutipraiwan U; Sampatanukul P; Chatamra K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Mar; 90(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 17427533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonographic findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ.
Lee MH; Ko EY; Han BK; Shin JH; Ko ES; Hahn SY
J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Oct; 41(8):465-71. PubMed ID: 23949917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
Gwak YJ; Kim HJ; Kwak JY; Lee SK; Shin KM; Lee HJ; Kim GC; Jang YJ; Han MH; Park JY; Jung JH
Acta Radiol; 2011 May; 52(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 21498298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sonographic findings of high-grade and non-high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Park JS; Park YM; Kim EK; Kim SJ; Han SS; Lee SJ; In HS; Ryu JH
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1687-97. PubMed ID: 21098839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
Holland R; Hendriks JH
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Aug; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7831529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity of breast MRI for ductal carcinoma in situ appearing as microcalcifications only on mammography.
Rinaldi P; Buccheri C; Giuliani M; Bufi E; Romani M; Patrolecco F; Belli P; Bonomo L
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1207-1212. PubMed ID: 27618803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances.
Ikeda DM; Andersson I
Radiology; 1989 Sep; 172(3):661-6. PubMed ID: 2549563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Local tumor recurrence following breast-conservation therapy: correlation of histopathologic findings with detection method and mammographic findings.
Giess CS; Keating DM; Osborne MP; Rosenblatt R
Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 10478253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ.
Yang WT; Tse GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jan; 182(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 14684521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study.
Brem RF; Fishman M; Rapelyea JA
Acad Radiol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):945-50. PubMed ID: 17659240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound Demonstration of Mammographically Detected Microcalcifications in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast.
Nagashima T; Hashimoto H; Oshida K; Nakano S; Tanabe N; Nikaido T; Koda K; Miyazaki M
Breast Cancer; 2005; 12(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16110292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.
Londero V; Zuiani C; Furlan A; Nori J; Bazzocchi M
Radiol Med; 2007 Sep; 112(6):863-76. PubMed ID: 17891529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications.
Dershaw DD; Abramson A; Kinne DW
Radiology; 1989 Feb; 170(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 2536185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Stomper PC; Connolly JL; Meyer JE; Harris JR
Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 2544922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound Image Classification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast: Analysis of 705 DCIS Lesions.
Watanabe T; Yamaguchi T; Tsunoda H; Kaoku S; Tohno E; Yasuda H; Ban K; Hirokaga K; Tanaka K; Umemoto T; Okuno T; Fujimoto Y; Nakatani S; Ito J; Ueno E
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):918-925. PubMed ID: 28242086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.
Ernster VL; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Zheng Y; Weaver DL; Cutter G; Yankaskas BC; Rosenberg R; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Taplin SH; Urban N; Geller BM
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(20):1546-54. PubMed ID: 12381707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ does not reliably predict histologic subtype.
Slanetz PJ; Giardino AA; Oyama T; Koerner FC; Halpern EF; Moore RH; Kopans DB
Breast J; 2001; 7(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 11843854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological features.
Mun HS; Shin HJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Kim H
Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):e27-35. PubMed ID: 23177096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histopathological characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ and association with imaging findings.
Tang X; Yamashita T; Hara M; Kumaki N; Tokuda Y; Masuda S
Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 25644245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
