These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17428341)

  • 1. How high is the level of technical noise in microarray data?
    Klebanov L; Yakovlev A
    Biol Direct; 2007 Apr; 2():9. PubMed ID: 17428341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Including probe-level measurement error in robust mixture clustering of replicated microarray gene expression.
    Liu X; Rattray M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article42. PubMed ID: 21194414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Redefinition of Affymetrix probe sets by sequence overlap with cDNA microarray probes reduces cross-platform inconsistencies in cancer-associated gene expression measurements.
    Carter SL; Eklund AC; Mecham BH; Kohane IS; Szallasi Z
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():107. PubMed ID: 15850491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of cDNA, oligonucleotide, and Affymetrix GeneChip gene expression microarray platforms.
    Woo Y; Affourtit J; Daigle S; Viale A; Johnson K; Naggert J; Churchill G
    J Biomol Tech; 2004 Dec; 15(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 15585824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance evaluation of commercial short-oligonucleotide microarrays and the impact of noise in making cross-platform correlations.
    Shippy R; Sendera TJ; Lockner R; Palaniappan C; Kaysser-Kranich T; Watts G; Alsobrook J
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Sep; 5():61. PubMed ID: 15345031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model-based variance-stabilizing transformation for Illumina microarray data.
    Lin SM; Du P; Huber W; Kibbe WA
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Feb; 36(2):e11. PubMed ID: 18178591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the similarity of gene expression data estimated with SAGE and Affymetrix GeneChips.
    van Ruissen F; Ruijter JM; Schaaf GJ; Asgharnegad L; Zwijnenburg DA; Kool M; Baas F
    BMC Genomics; 2005 Jun; 6():91. PubMed ID: 15955238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A variable fold change threshold determines significance for expression microarrays.
    Mariani TJ; Budhraja V; Mecham BH; Gu CC; Watson MA; Sadovsky Y
    FASEB J; 2003 Feb; 17(2):321-3. PubMed ID: 12475896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new method for class prediction based on signed-rank algorithms applied to Affymetrix microarray experiments.
    Rème T; Hose D; De Vos J; Vassal A; Poulain PO; Pantesco V; Goldschmidt H; Klein B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():16. PubMed ID: 18190711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expression profiling using affymetrix genechip probe arrays.
    Schinke-Braun M; Couget JA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 366():13-40. PubMed ID: 17568117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transformation of expression intensities across generations of Affymetrix microarrays using sequence matching and regression modeling.
    Bhattacharya S; Mariani TJ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Oct; 33(18):e157. PubMed ID: 16224098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Large scale real-time PCR validation on gene expression measurements from two commercial long-oligonucleotide microarrays.
    Wang Y; Barbacioru C; Hyland F; Xiao W; Hunkapiller KL; Blake J; Chan F; Gonzalez C; Zhang L; Samaha RR
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Mar; 7():59. PubMed ID: 16551369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ARSyN: a method for the identification and removal of systematic noise in multifactorial time course microarray experiments.
    Nueda MJ; Ferrer A; Conesa A
    Biostatistics; 2012 Jul; 13(3):553-66. PubMed ID: 22085896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gene expression and isoform variation analysis using Affymetrix Exon Arrays.
    Bemmo A; Benovoy D; Kwan T; Gaffney DJ; Jensen RV; Majewski J
    BMC Genomics; 2008 Nov; 9():529. PubMed ID: 18990248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative impact of key sources of systematic noise in Affymetrix and Illumina gene-expression microarray experiments.
    Kitchen RR; Sabine VS; Simen AA; Dixon JM; Bartlett JM; Sims AH
    BMC Genomics; 2011 Dec; 12():589. PubMed ID: 22133085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of probe level patterns in Affymetrix microarray data.
    Cambon AC; Khalyfa A; Cooper NG; Thompson CM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():146. PubMed ID: 17480226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gene filtering in the analysis of Illumina microarray experiments.
    Forcheh AC; Verbeke G; Kasim A; Lin D; Shkedy Z; Talloen W; Göhlmann HW; Clement L
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 22499694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation analysis of external RNA controls reveals its utility for assessment of microarray assay.
    Fan X; Fang H; Hong H; Perkins R; Shi L; Tong W
    Anal Biochem; 2009 Feb; 385(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 19059192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Putative null distributions corresponding to tests of differential expression in the Golden Spike dataset are intensity dependent.
    Gaile DP; Miecznikowski JC
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():105. PubMed ID: 17445265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross platform microarray analysis for robust identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Bosotti R; Locatelli G; Healy S; Scacheri E; Sartori L; Mercurio C; Calogero R; Isacchi A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. PubMed ID: 17430572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.