These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17429677)

  • 1. Cross-validation of the 20- versus 30-s Wingate anaerobic test.
    Laurent CM; Meyers MC; Robinson CA; Green JM
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2007 Aug; 100(6):645-51. PubMed ID: 17429677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Allometric scaling of Wingate anaerobic power test scores in men.
    Stickley CD; Hetzler RK; Wages JJ; Freemyer BG; Kimura IF
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Sep; 27(9):2603-11. PubMed ID: 23364295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanically braked elliptical Wingate test: modification considerations, load optimization, and reliability.
    Ozkaya O; Colakoglu M; Kuzucu EO; Yildiztepe E
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1313-23. PubMed ID: 21904246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a nonexercise prediction equation of anaerobic power.
    Stickley CD; Wages JJ; Kimura IF; Hetzler RK
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Nov; 26(11):3067-74. PubMed ID: 22158091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wingate anaerobic test reference values for male power athletes.
    Coppin E; Heath EM; Bressel E; Wagner DR
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2012 Sep; 7(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 22174179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and validity of a 20-s alternative to the wingate anaerobic test in team sport male athletes.
    Attia A; Hachana Y; Chaabène H; Gaddour A; Neji Z; Shephard RJ; Chelly MS
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114444. PubMed ID: 25474744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of the Wingate anaerobic mechanical power outputs from a maximal incremental cardiopulmonary exercise stress test using machine-learning approach.
    Leopold E; Navot-Mintzer D; Shargal E; Tsuk S; Tuller T; Scheinowitz M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212199. PubMed ID: 30861009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity and Reliability of the Lode Excalibur Sport Cycle Ergometer for the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Lunn WR; Axtell RS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Oct; 35(10):2894-2901. PubMed ID: 31453946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptation of Anaerobic Field-Based Tests for Wheelchair Basketball Athletes.
    Weber VMR; Fernandes DZ; Vieira ER; Ferreira SA; da Silva DF; Queiroga MR
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2021 Dec; 92(4):715-722. PubMed ID: 34038320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How anaerobic is the Wingate Anaerobic Test for humans?
    Beneke R; Pollmann C; Bleif I; Leithäuser RM; Hütler M
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Aug; 87(4-5):388-92. PubMed ID: 12172878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Caffeine mouth rinse has no effects on anaerobic energy yield during a Wingate Test.
    Marinho AH; Mendes EV; Vilela RA; Bastos-Silva VJ; Araujo GG; Balikian P
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2020 Jan; 60(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 31640317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of a 5 x 6-s maximal cycling repeated-sprint test in trained female team-sport athletes.
    McGawley K; Bishop D
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Nov; 98(4):383-93. PubMed ID: 16955291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and validity of a new repeated agility test as a measure of anaerobic and explosive power.
    Haj-Sassi R; Dardouri W; Gharbi Z; Chaouachi A; Mansour H; Rabhi A; Mahfoudhi ME
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Feb; 25(2):472-80. PubMed ID: 21240028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting anaerobic capabilities in 11-13-year-old boys.
    Mastrangelo MA; Chaloupka EC; Kang J; Lacke CJ; Angelucci J; Martz WP; Biren GB
    J Strength Cond Res; 2004 Feb; 18(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 14971980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Muscle fibre conduction velocity during a 30-s Wingate anaerobic test.
    Stewart D; Farina D; Shen C; Macaluso A
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2011 Jun; 21(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 21419647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of time-of-day and Ramadan fasting on anaerobic performances.
    Chtourou H; Hammouda O; Chaouachi A; Chamari K; Souissi N
    Int J Sports Med; 2012 Feb; 33(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22318530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple multistage field test for the prediction of anaerobic capacity in female games players.
    Cooper SM; Baker JS; Eaton ZE; Matthews N
    Br J Sports Med; 2004 Dec; 38(6):784-9. PubMed ID: 15562181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anaerobic testing using the Wingate and Evans-Quinney protocols with and without toe stirrups.
    LaVoie N; Dallaire J; Brayne S; Barrett D
    Can J Appl Sport Sci; 1984 Mar; 9(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 6705122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of Velotron chainring size on Wingate anaerobic test.
    Clark NW; Wagner DR; Heath EM
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Feb; 21(2):202-206. PubMed ID: 28807684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of a six second cycle test for the determination of peak power output.
    Herbert P; Sculthorpe N; Baker JS; Grace FM
    Res Sports Med; 2015; 23(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 25720917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.