BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17430277)

  • 1. Assessing professionalism in the context of an objective structured clinical examination: an in-depth study of the rating process.
    Mazor KM; Zanetti ML; Alper EJ; Hatem D; Barrett SV; Meterko V; Gammon W; Pugnaire MP
    Med Educ; 2007 Apr; 41(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 17430277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The one minute mentor: a pilot study assessing medical students' and residents' professional behaviours through recordings of clinical preceptors' immediate feedback.
    Topps D; Evans RJ; Thistlethwaite JE; Nan Tie R; Ellaway RH
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2009 May; 22(1):189. PubMed ID: 19953438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating medical students' non-verbal communication during the objective structured clinical examination.
    Ishikawa H; Hashimoto H; Kinoshita M; Fujimori S; Shimizu T; Yano E
    Med Educ; 2006 Dec; 40(12):1180-7. PubMed ID: 17118111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. LUCAS: a theoretically informed instrument to assess clinical communication in objective structured clinical examinations.
    Huntley CD; Salmon P; Fisher PL; Fletcher I; Young B
    Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 22324526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing students' communication skills: validation of a global rating.
    Scheffer S; Muehlinghaus I; Froehmel A; Ortwein H
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):583-92. PubMed ID: 17636371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination.
    Srinivasan M; Hauer KE; Der-Martirosian C; Wilkes M; Gesundheit N
    Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 17727526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of medical students' written expressions of emotion and coping and standardized patients' ratings of student professionalism and communication skills.
    Shapiro J; Lie D
    Med Teach; 2004 Dec; 26(8):733-5. PubMed ID: 15763880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students.
    Lurie SJ; Nofziger AC; Meldrum S; Mooney C; Epstein RM
    Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 40(11):1088-97. PubMed ID: 17054618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between checklist scores on a communication OSCE and analogue patients' perceptions of communication.
    Mazor KM; Ockene JK; Rogers HJ; Carlin MM; Quirk ME
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 15912283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From behaviours to attributions: further concerns regarding the evaluation of professionalism.
    Ginsburg S; Regehr G; Mylopoulos M
    Med Educ; 2009 May; 43(5):414-25. PubMed ID: 19422488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of professionalism in undergraduate medical students.
    O'Sullivan AJ; Toohey SM
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 18484455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. First-year medical students' assessment of their own communication skills: a video-based, open-ended approach.
    Zick A; Granieri M; Makoul G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Oct; 68(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 17640843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using a standardised patient assessment to measure professional attributes.
    van Zanten M; Boulet JR; Norcini JJ; McKinley D
    Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 15612897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Categorization of unprofessional behaviours identified during administration of and remediation after a comprehensive clinical performance examination using a validated professionalism framework.
    Teherani A; O'Sullivan PS; Lovett M; Hauer KE
    Med Teach; 2009 Nov; 31(11):1007-12. PubMed ID: 19909041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the quality of clinical teaching: a preliminary study.
    Conigliaro RL; Stratton TD
    Med Educ; 2010 Apr; 44(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 20444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The clinical conscientiousness index: a valid tool for exploring professionalism in the clinical undergraduate setting.
    Kelly M; O'Flynn S; McLachlan J; Sawdon MA
    Acad Med; 2012 Sep; 87(9):1218-24. PubMed ID: 22836848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of unstructured parent narratives to evaluate medical student competencies in communication and professionalism.
    Liu GC; Harris MA; Keyton SA; Frankel RM
    Ambul Pediatr; 2007; 7(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17512880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The theory of planned behaviour in medical education: a model for integrating professionalism training.
    Archer R; Elder W; Hustedde C; Milam A; Joyce J
    Med Educ; 2008 Aug; 42(8):771-7. PubMed ID: 18715476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The nature of qualitative comments in evaluating professionalism.
    Frohna A; Stern D
    Med Educ; 2005 Aug; 39(8):763-8. PubMed ID: 16048618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to assess multiple physician competencies in postgraduate training.
    Jefferies A; Simmons B; Tabak D; McIlroy JH; Lee KS; Roukema H; Skidmore M
    Med Teach; 2007 Mar; 29(2-3):183-91. PubMed ID: 17701631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.