These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17430277)

  • 21. Further challenges in measuring communication skills: accounting for actor effects in standardised patient assessments.
    Lurie SJ; Mooney CJ; Nofziger AC; Meldrum SC; Epstein RM
    Med Educ; 2008 Jul; 42(7):662-8. PubMed ID: 18507768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reasoning when it counts: students' rationales for action on a professionalism exam.
    Ginsburg SR; Regehr G; Mylopoulos M
    Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S40-3. PubMed ID: 17895688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing the head-to-toe physical examination skills of medical students.
    Yudkowsky R; Downing S; Klamen D; Valaski M; Eulenberg B; Popa M
    Med Teach; 2004 Aug; 26(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 15369880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Teaching professionalism: a South African perspective.
    Preez RR; Pickworth GE; Van Rooyen M
    Med Teach; 2007 Nov; 29(9):e284-91. PubMed ID: 18158653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Professionalism and communication in the intensive care unit: reliability and validity of a simulated family conference.
    Schmitz CC; Chipman JG; Luxenberg MG; Beilman GJ
    Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(4):224-38. PubMed ID: 19088667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of differential rater function over time (DRIFT) on objective structured clinical examination ratings.
    McLaughlin K; Ainslie M; Coderre S; Wright B; Violato C
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):989-92. PubMed ID: 19769648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing validity of standardized patient ratings of medical students' communication behavior using the Roter interaction analysis system.
    Price EG; Windish DM; Magaziner J; Cooper LA
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jan; 70(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 18037602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simulating the longitudinal doctor-patient relationship: experiences of simulated patients in successive consultations.
    Linssen T; van Dalen J; Rethans JJ
    Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):873-8. PubMed ID: 17727528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The reliability of summative judgements based on objective structured clinical examination cases distributed across the clinical year.
    Bergus GR; Kreiter CD
    Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 41(7):661-6. PubMed ID: 17614886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Medical students' perceptions of identity in communication skills training: a qualitative study.
    Vågan A
    Med Educ; 2009 Mar; 43(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19250352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reflective teaching of medical communication skills with DiViDU: assessing the level of student reflection on recorded consultations with simulated patients.
    Hulsman RL; Harmsen AB; Fabriek M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Feb; 74(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 19062232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing resident's knowledge and communication skills using four different evaluation tools.
    Nuovo J; Bertakis KD; Azari R
    Med Educ; 2006 Jul; 40(7):630-6. PubMed ID: 16836535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rater errors in a clinical skills assessment of medical students.
    Iramaneerat C; Yudkowsky R
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Sep; 30(3):266-83. PubMed ID: 17693619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Components of postgraduate competence: analyses of thirty years of longitudinal data.
    Hojat M; Paskin DL; Callahan CA; Nasca TJ; Louis DZ; Veloski J; Erdmann JB; Gonnella JS
    Med Educ; 2007 Oct; 41(10):982-9. PubMed ID: 17908116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Children and their parents assessing the doctor-patient interaction: a rating system for doctors' communication skills.
    Crossley J; Eiser C; Davies HA
    Med Educ; 2005 Aug; 39(8):820-8. PubMed ID: 16048624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Senior medical students' appraisal of CanMEDS competencies.
    Rademakers JJ; de Rooy N; Ten Cate OT
    Med Educ; 2007 Oct; 41(10):990-4. PubMed ID: 17822413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The view from over there: reframing the OSCE through the experience of standardised patient raters.
    Johnston JL; Lundy G; McCullough M; Gormley GJ
    Med Educ; 2013 Sep; 47(9):899-909. PubMed ID: 23931539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Learning intimate examinations with simulated patients: the evaluation of medical students' performance.
    Hendrickx K; De Winter B; Tjalma W; Avonts D; Peeraer G; Wyndaele JJ
    Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):e139-47. PubMed ID: 19404886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of two instruments for assessing communication skills in a general practice objective structured clinical examination.
    Van Nuland M; Van Den Noortgate W; Degryse J; Goedhuys J
    Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 41(7):676-83. PubMed ID: 17614888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Students' views on the use of real patients and simulated patients in undergraduate medical education.
    Bokken L; Rethans JJ; van Heurn L; Duvivier R; Scherpbier A; van der Vleuten C
    Acad Med; 2009 Jul; 84(7):958-63. PubMed ID: 19550197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.