These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Current attitudes toward voice studio teaching technology: a bicoastal survey of classical singing pedagogues. Barnes-Burroughs K; Lan WY; Edwards E; Archambeault N J Voice; 2008 Sep; 22(5):590-602. PubMed ID: 17379479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A test of the effectiveness of speaker verification for differentiating between identical twins. Ariyaeeinia A; Morrison C; Malegaonkar A; Black S Sci Justice; 2008 Dec; 48(4):182-6. PubMed ID: 19192680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating iPhone recordings for acoustic voice assessment. Lin E; Hornibrook J; Ormond T Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(3):122-30. PubMed ID: 22584162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A classification based approach to speech segregation. Han K; Wang D J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3475-83. PubMed ID: 23145627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward optimizing stream fusion in multistream recognition of speech. Mesgarani N; Thomas S; Hermansky H J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):EL14-8. PubMed ID: 21786862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory motivated front-end for noisy speech using spectro-temporal modulation filtering. Ganapathy S; Omar M J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):EL343-9. PubMed ID: 25373991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling the temporal dynamics of distinctive feature landmark detectors for speech recognition. Jansen A; Niyogi P J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1739-58. PubMed ID: 19045664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Acoustic study of esophageal voice. Comparison with laryngeal voice]. Besson R; Grateau P; Péchard L Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1984; 105(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 6505421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Objective estimation of tracheoesophageal speech ratings using an auditory model. McDonald R; Parsa V; Doyle PC J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1032-41. PubMed ID: 20136224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of speaking style and implications for speech recognition. Shinozaki T; Ostendorf M; Atlas L J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1500-10. PubMed ID: 19739763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speaker normalization for chinese vowel recognition in cochlear implants. Luo X; Fu QJ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1358-61. PubMed ID: 16042003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic intelligibility assessment of pathologic speech over the telephone. Haderlein T; Nöth E; Batliner A; Eysholdt U; Rosanowski F Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Dec; 36(4):175-81. PubMed ID: 21875389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delay-coordinates embeddings as a data mining tool for denoising speech signals. Napoletani D; Struppa DC; Sauer T; Berenstein CA; Walnut D Chaos; 2006 Dec; 16(4):043116. PubMed ID: 17199394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The potentials for testing voice and speech functions from the oral medicine viewpoint. A review paper]. Reitemeier G; Heidelbach JG; Hloucal U; Reitemeier B Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1990; 78(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 2150259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A speech-controlled environmental control system for people with severe dysarthria. Hawley MS; Enderby P; Green P; Cunningham S; Brownsell S; Carmichael J; Parker M; Hatzis A; O'Neill P; Palmer R Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jun; 29(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 17049905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]