These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1743178)

  • 1. The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Snook SH; Ciriello VM
    Ergonomics; 1991 Sep; 34(9):1197-213. PubMed ID: 1743178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of task duration on psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Ciriello VM; Snook SH; Blick AC; Wilkinson PL
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 2354696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Further studies of psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Ciriello VM; Snook SH; Hughes GJ
    Hum Factors; 1993 Mar; 35(1):175-86. PubMed ID: 8509102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Secular changes in psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces over 20 years for male industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM; Dempsey PG; Maikala RV; O'Brien NV
    Ergonomics; 2008 May; 51(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18432440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physiological and psychophysical responses in handling maximum acceptable weights under different footwear--floor friction conditions.
    Li KW; Yu RF; Han XL
    Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 17010302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychophysical approach to manual materials handling task design.
    Ayoub MM; Dempsey PG
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 9973869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychophysical determination of load carrying capacity for a 1-h work period by Chinese males.
    Wu SP; Chen CC
    Ergonomics; 2001 Sep; 44(11):1008-23. PubMed ID: 11693245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association between spinal loads and the psychophysical determination of maximum acceptable force during pushing tasks.
    Le P; Dufour J; Monat H; Rose J; Huber Z; Alder E; Radin Umar RZ; Hennessey B; Dutt M; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1104-14. PubMed ID: 22676341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of carrying methods and box handles on two-person team carrying capacity for females.
    Wu SP; Chang SY
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):615-9. PubMed ID: 20116781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum acceptable forces of dynamic pushing: comparison of two techniques.
    Ciriello VM; McGorry RW; Martin SE; Bezverkhny IB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 9973870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Symmetric and asymmetric manual materials handling. Part 1: Physiology and psychophysics.
    Drury CG; Deeb JM; Hartman B; Woolley S; Drury CE; Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1989 May; 32(5):467-89. PubMed ID: 2767042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined manual handling tasks in restricted postures.
    Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jul; 34(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 1915255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comprehensive manual handling limits for lowering, pushing, pulling and carrying activities.
    Shoaf C; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Waters T; Christensen D
    Ergonomics; 1997 Nov; 40(11):1183-200. PubMed ID: 9375533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks: 2. Discomfort, rating of perceived exertion and heart rate measures.
    Straker LM; Stevenson MG; Twomey LT
    Ergonomics; 1997 Jun; 40(6):656-69. PubMed ID: 9174417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development of a model to predict the effects of worker and task factors on foot placements in manual material handling tasks.
    Wagner DW; Reed MP; Chaffin DB
    Ergonomics; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1368-84. PubMed ID: 20967659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for side and back lifting.
    Lee K; Waikar A; Aghazadeh F
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1990 Jun; 19(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 2092069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oxygen consumption prediction models for individual and combination materials handling tasks.
    Dempsey PG; Ciriello VM; Maikala RV; O'Brien NV
    Ergonomics; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1776-89. PubMed ID: 18941980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.