These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1743178)

  • 21. A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.
    Nicholson AS
    Ergonomics; 1989 Sep; 32(9):1125-44. PubMed ID: 2680481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workload by Chinese subjects.
    Zhu ZX; Zhang ZJ
    Ergonomics; 1990 Jul; 33(7):875-84. PubMed ID: 2226423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Force direction and physical load in dynamic pushing and pulling.
    de Looze MP; van Greuningen K; Rebel J; Kingma I; Kuijer PP
    Ergonomics; 2000 Mar; 43(3):377-90. PubMed ID: 10755660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceived exertion of physical effort for various manual handling tasks.
    Asfour SS; Ayoub MM; Mital A; Bethea NJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Mar; 44(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 6846149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Psychophysical lifting capacity over extended periods.
    Fernandez JE; Ayoub MM; Smith JL
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 2009847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of task variables and their interactions in lifting and lowering loads.
    Mital A; Ayoub MM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1981 Feb; 42(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 7234678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A training programme to improve human physical capability for manual handling jobs.
    Genaidy AM
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 2009844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mechanical loading of the low back and shoulders during pushing and pulling activities.
    Hoozemans MJ; Kuijer PP; Kingma I; van Dieën JH; de Vries WH; van der Woude LH; Veeger DJ; van der Beek AJ; Frings-Dresen MH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Jan; 47(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 14660215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Psychophysically determined forces of dynamic pushing for female industrial workers: Comparison of two apparatuses.
    Ciriello VM; Maikala RV; Dempsey PG; O'Brien NV
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 19628201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Psychophysically acceptable weights for a combination lifting task using bags with handles.
    Fredericks TK; Fernandez JE; Rodrigues CC
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1994 Dec; 23(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 7730595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Discriminability of load heaviness: implications for the psychophysical approach to manual lifting.
    Karwowski W; Shumate C; Yates JW; Pongpatana N
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):729-44. PubMed ID: 1633786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ergonomic study of a vertical rope-pulling task from a scaffolding.
    Wu SP; Ho CP; Chi HC
    Ergonomics; 2008 Mar; 51(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 18311611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A manual materials handling study of bag lifting.
    Smith JL; Jiang BC
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Aug; 45(8):505-8. PubMed ID: 6475757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the sensitivity of three psychophysical techniques to three manual materials handling task variables.
    Kumar S; Narayan Y; Bjornsdottir S
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 9973872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gender differences in psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces for industrial workers observed after twenty years.
    Ciriello VM; Maikala RV; Dempsey PG; O'Brien NV
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2011 Jun; 84(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 20953621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A critical review of biomechanical, epidemiological, physiological and psychophysical criteria for designing manual materials handling tasks.
    Dempsey PG
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jan; 41(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 9468807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimal acceptable handling time intervals for lifting and lowering tasks.
    Lee TH
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 14559424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Maximum acceptable weight of lift for manual lifting tasks].
    Chen J; Yang L
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 24(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 16701027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Handle positions and angles in a dynamic lifting task. Part 2. Psychophysical measures and heart rate.
    Drury CG; Deeb JM
    Ergonomics; 1986 Jun; 29(6):769-77. PubMed ID: 3743535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lower back muscle forces in pushing and pulling.
    Lee KS; Chaffin DB; Waikar AM; Chung MK
    Ergonomics; 1989 Dec; 32(12):1551-63. PubMed ID: 2534511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.