127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17432986)
1. Evaluating the accuracy of data entry in a regional colorectal cancer database: implications for national audit.
Kelly M; Lamah M
Colorectal Dis; 2007 May; 9(4):337-9. PubMed ID: 17432986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An audit of the Irish National Intellectual Disability Database.
Dodd P; Craig S; Kelly F; Guerin S
Res Dev Disabil; 2010; 31(2):446-51. PubMed ID: 19939623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of administrative data with the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) colorectal cancer database.
Garout M; Tilney HS; Tekkis PP; Aylin P
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2008 Feb; 23(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 17960396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Completeness of data entry in three cancer surgery databases.
Warsi AA; White S; McCulloch P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2002 Dec; 28(8):850-6. PubMed ID: 12477477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate?
Herbert MA; Prince SL; Williams JL; Magee MJ; Mack MJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 77(6):1960-4; discussion 1964-5. PubMed ID: 15172246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 2008 Niday Perinatal Database quality audit: report of a quality assurance project.
Dunn S; Bottomley J; Ali A; Walker M
Chronic Dis Inj Can; 2011 Dec; 32(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 22153174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the quality of The National Pain Database for pain management services in the United Kingdom.
Hall GC; Bryant TN; Merrett LK; Price C
Anaesthesia; 2008 Nov; 63(11):1217-21. PubMed ID: 19032256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland (ACPGBI): Guidelines for the Management of Cancer of the Colon, Rectum and Anus (2017) - Audit and Outcome Reporting.
Faiz O
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jul; 19 Suppl 1():71-73. PubMed ID: 28632313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A critical evaluation of HIPE data.
O'Callaghan A; Colgan MP; McGuigan C; Smyth F; Haider N; O'Neill S; Moore D; Madhavan P
Ir Med J; 2012 Jan; 105(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 22397209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of data in the Manchester orthopaedic database.
Barrie JL; Marsh DR
BMJ; 1992 Jan; 304(6820):159-62. PubMed ID: 1737162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Routine data: a resource for clinical audit?
McKee M
Qual Health Care; 1993 Jun; 2(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 10131630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Linking data from hospital and cancer registry databases: should this be standard practice?
Field K; Kosmider S; Johns J; Farrugia H; Hastie I; Croxford M; Chapman M; Harold M; Murigu N; Gibbs P
Intern Med J; 2010 Aug; 40(8):566-73. PubMed ID: 19460066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of Australian data in the Australasian Vascular Audit.
Beiles CB; Bourke BM
ANZ J Surg; 2014 Sep; 84(9):624-7. PubMed ID: 24980273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The first 1000 patients on an internet-based colorectal neoplasia database across private and public medicine in Australia: development of a binational model for the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand.
McMurrick PJ; Oliva K; Carne P; Reid C; Polglase A; Bell S; Farmer KC; Ranchod P
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Feb; 57(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 24401877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Basingstoke Orthopaedic Database: a high quality accurate information system for audit.
Barlow IW; Flynn NA; Britton JM
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Nov; 76(6 Suppl):285-7. PubMed ID: 7598401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving DAHNO data collection using a uniform modelling tool for patient care pathways.
Jaberoo MC; Vlastarakos PV; Hancock D; Trinidade A; Mochloulis G
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 51(5):e77. PubMed ID: 22571811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Lessons from developing and running a clinical database for colorectal cancer.
Sehgal A; Davies E
J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Feb; 12(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 16422784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Data quality review program: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac National Database.
Grover FL; Shroyer AL; Edwards FH; Pae WE; Ferguson TB; Gay WA; Clark RE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Oct; 62(4):1229-31. PubMed ID: 8823129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical audit: a review. Proceedings of an audit symposium.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Nov; 71(6 Suppl):87-9. PubMed ID: 2610473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A critical evaluation of the electronic surgical logbook.
Achuthan R; Grover K; MacFie J
BMC Med Educ; 2006 Mar; 6():15. PubMed ID: 16509987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
