These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17433243)

  • 1. Within-family marker-assisted selection for aquaculture species.
    Sonesson AK
    Genet Sel Evol; 2007; 39(3):301-17. PubMed ID: 17433243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marker assisted selection for the improvement of two antagonistic traits under mixed inheritance.
    Verrier E
    Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 11268312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulation study on the efficiencies of MOET nucleus breeding schemes applying marker assisted selection in dairy cattle.
    Luo W; Wang Y; Zhang Y
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Mar; 52(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 19294355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A low-marker density implementation of genomic selection in aquaculture using within-family genomic breeding values.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):39. PubMed ID: 24127852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Across-family marker-assisted selection using selective genotyping strategies in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Ansari-Mahyari S; Sørensen AC; Lund MS; Thomsen H; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Apr; 91(4):1628-39. PubMed ID: 18349255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefits from marker-assisted selection under an additive polygenic genetic model.
    Villanueva B; Pong-Wong R; Fernández J; Toro MA
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Aug; 83(8):1747-52. PubMed ID: 16024693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marker assisted selection with optimised contributions of the candidates to selection.
    Villanueva B; Pong-Wong R; Woolliams JA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(6):679-703. PubMed ID: 12486398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pedigree relationships to control inbreeding in optimum-contribution selection realise more genetic gain than genomic relationships.
    Henryon M; Liu H; Berg P; Su G; Nielsen HM; Gebregiwergis GT; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jul; 51(1):39. PubMed ID: 31286868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency of multistage marker-assisted selection in the improvement of multiple quantitative traits.
    Xie C; Xu S
    Heredity (Edinb); 1998 Apr; 80 ( Pt 4)():489-98. PubMed ID: 9618913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marker-assisted selection reduces expected inbreeding but can result in large effects of hitchhiking.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Jun; 127(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 20536636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs.
    Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Jun; 41(1):37. PubMed ID: 19566932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of marker-assisted selection under different initial frequency of QTL favorable allele.
    Lu SX; Wu CX; Lian LS
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 30(8):750-4. PubMed ID: 14682244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of communal rearing of families and DNA pooling in aquaculture genomic selection schemes.
    Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Nov; 42(1):41. PubMed ID: 21092198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marker assisted selection for genetic improvement of animal populations when a single QTL is marked.
    Ruane J; Colleau JJ
    Genet Res; 1995 Aug; 66(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 8575670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic response from marker assisted selection in an outbred population for differing marker bracket sizes and with two identified quantitative trait loci.
    Spelman R; Bovenhuis H
    Genetics; 1998 Mar; 148(3):1389-96. PubMed ID: 9539451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linkage disequilibrium and selection response in two-stage marker-assisted selection of dairy cattle over several generations.
    Schulman NF; Dentine MR
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Apr; 122(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 16130477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Theoretical efficiency of multiple-trait quantitative trait loci-assisted selection.
    Togashi K; Lin CY
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Feb; 127(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 20074187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.