These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17433243)

  • 21. Maximizing genetic gain over multiple generations with quantitative trait locus selection and control of inbreeding.
    Villanueva B; Dekkers JC; Woolliams JA; Settar P
    J Anim Sci; 2004 May; 82(5):1305-14. PubMed ID: 15144069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genetic progress in multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes using genetic markers.
    Schrooten C; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1569-81. PubMed ID: 15778327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: double haploid sib test populations.
    Nirea KG; Sonesson AK; Woolliams JA; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Oct; 44(1):30. PubMed ID: 23110512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Marker-assisted selection for commercial crossbred performance.
    Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Sep; 85(9):2104-14. PubMed ID: 17504955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impacts of QTL x environment interactions on genetic response to marker-assisted selection.
    Liu PY; Zhu J; Yan L
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Jan; 33(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 16450589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Allele frequency changes due to hitch-hiking in genomic selection programs.
    Liu H; Sørensen AC; Meuwissen TH; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):8. PubMed ID: 24495634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Superiority of QTL-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Abdel-Azim G; Freeman AE
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jul; 85(7):1869-80. PubMed ID: 12201538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding.
    Sonesson AK; Woolliams JA; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Aug; 44(1):27. PubMed ID: 22898324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genomic selection for marker-assisted improvement in line crosses.
    Piyasatian N; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
    Theor Appl Genet; 2007 Sep; 115(5):665-74. PubMed ID: 17673971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing genetic gain, inbreeding, and bias attributable to different flock genetic means in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
    Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):526-35. PubMed ID: 18073281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Two-stage selection strategies utilizing marker-quantitative trait locus information and individual performance.
    Gomez-Raya L; Klemetsdal G
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):2008-18. PubMed ID: 10461975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genetic and economic responses for within-family marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Spelman RJ; Garrick DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Nov; 81(11):2942-50. PubMed ID: 9839238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with auxiliary traits.
    Narain P
    J Biosci; 2003 Sep; 28(5):569-79. PubMed ID: 14517360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of non-random mating on genomic and BLUP selection schemes.
    Nirea KG; Sonesson AK; Woolliams JA; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Apr; 44(1):11. PubMed ID: 22494646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Trends in genome-wide and region-specific genetic diversity in the Dutch-Flemish Holstein-Friesian breeding program from 1986 to 2015.
    Doekes HP; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Hiemstra SJ; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Apr; 50(1):15. PubMed ID: 29642838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Phenotypic versus marker-assisted selection for stalk strength and second-generation European corn borer resistance in maize.
    Flint-Garcia SA; Darrah LL; McMullen MD; Hibbard BE
    Theor Appl Genet; 2003 Nov; 107(7):1331-6. PubMed ID: 12928781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genetic evaluation with major genes and polygenic inheritance when some animals are not genotyped using gene content multiple-trait BLUP.
    Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():89. PubMed ID: 26576649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.