211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17433597)
1. Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma.
Liu J; Xu Y; Wang J
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 62(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 17433597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of combination of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for evaluation of ovarian masses.
Tsuboyama T; Tatsumi M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Sakane M; Hori Y; Morii E; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N
Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):524-31. PubMed ID: 24637584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Indeterminate ovarian mass at US: incremental value of second imaging test for characterization--meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis.
Kinkel K; Lu Y; Mehdizade A; Pelte MF; Hricak H
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 15955864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities--report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group.
Tempany CM; Zou KH; Silverman SG; Brown DL; Kurtz AB; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 10831697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.
Wu Y; Peng H; Zhao X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):967-74. PubMed ID: 25701533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ovarian cystic lesions: a current approach to diagnosis and management.
Ackerman S; Irshad A; Lewis M; Anis M
Radiol Clin North Am; 2013 Nov; 51(6):1067-85. PubMed ID: 24210445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Malignant Brenner tumor with transition from benign to malignant components: computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings with pathological correlation.
Takeuchi M; Matsuzaki K; Sano N; Furumoto H; Nishitani H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):553-4. PubMed ID: 18664841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis--report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group.
Kurtz AB; Tsimikas JV; Tempany CM; Hamper UM; Arger PH; Bree RL; Wechsler RJ; Francis IR; Kuhlman JE; Siegelman ES; Mitchell DG; Silverman SG; Brown DL; Sheth S; Coleman BG; Ellis JH; Kurman RJ; Caudry DJ; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 10405715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Value of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and serum CA-125 detection in differential diagnosis of ovarian masses].
Zhou Q; Liu BL; Jiang J; Lei XY
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 Oct; 29(10):2007-9. PubMed ID: 19861251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. US characterization of ovarian masses: a meta-analysis.
Kinkel K; Hricak H; Lu Y; Tsuda K; Filly RA
Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):803-11. PubMed ID: 11110947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI features of ovarian cystic lesions.
Park SB; Lee JB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 40(3):503-15. PubMed ID: 24474469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Computerized tomography and MR tomography in diagnosis of ovarian tumors].
Hamm B
Radiologe; 1994 Jul; 34(7):362-9. PubMed ID: 7938483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiological staging of ovarian carcinoma.
Moyle P; Addley HC; Sala E
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2010 Oct; 31(5):388-98. PubMed ID: 20974358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of US, CT, and MRI.
Togashi K
Eur Radiol; 2003 Dec; 13 Suppl 4():L87-104. PubMed ID: 15018172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck].
Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J
Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses.
Huber S; Medl M; Baumann L; Czembirek H
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):2501-7. PubMed ID: 12174952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Solitary pulmonary nodules: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--perfusion differences in malignant and benign lesions.
Schaefer JF; Vollmar J; Schick F; Vonthein R; Seemann MD; Aebert H; Dierkesmann R; Friedel G; Claussen CD
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):544-53. PubMed ID: 15215548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT and MRI findings of type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer.
Liu D; Zhang L; Indima N; Peng K; Li Q; Hua T; Tang G
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():225-233. PubMed ID: 28583639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The integrated diagnosis of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: echography, color Doppler, computed tomography and magnetic resonance compared].
De Gaetano A; De Franco A; Maresca G; Manfredi R; Barbaro B; Monteforte MG
Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):258-69. PubMed ID: 8628940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The added value of PET/Ce-CT/DW-MRI fusion in assessment of hepatic focal lesions: PET/Ce-CT/DW-MRI fusion in hepatic focal lesion.
Salem S; Houseni M; Zidan L; Kandil A
Nucl Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 42(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 25907467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
