These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17433597)
1. Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma. Liu J; Xu Y; Wang J Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 62(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 17433597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of combination of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for evaluation of ovarian masses. Tsuboyama T; Tatsumi M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Sakane M; Hori Y; Morii E; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):524-31. PubMed ID: 24637584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Indeterminate ovarian mass at US: incremental value of second imaging test for characterization--meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Kinkel K; Lu Y; Mehdizade A; Pelte MF; Hricak H Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 15955864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities--report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group. Tempany CM; Zou KH; Silverman SG; Brown DL; Kurtz AB; McNeil BJ Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 10831697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Wu Y; Peng H; Zhao X Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):967-74. PubMed ID: 25701533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ovarian cystic lesions: a current approach to diagnosis and management. Ackerman S; Irshad A; Lewis M; Anis M Radiol Clin North Am; 2013 Nov; 51(6):1067-85. PubMed ID: 24210445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Malignant Brenner tumor with transition from benign to malignant components: computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings with pathological correlation. Takeuchi M; Matsuzaki K; Sano N; Furumoto H; Nishitani H J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):553-4. PubMed ID: 18664841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis--report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Kurtz AB; Tsimikas JV; Tempany CM; Hamper UM; Arger PH; Bree RL; Wechsler RJ; Francis IR; Kuhlman JE; Siegelman ES; Mitchell DG; Silverman SG; Brown DL; Sheth S; Coleman BG; Ellis JH; Kurman RJ; Caudry DJ; McNeil BJ Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 10405715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Value of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and serum CA-125 detection in differential diagnosis of ovarian masses]. Zhou Q; Liu BL; Jiang J; Lei XY Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 Oct; 29(10):2007-9. PubMed ID: 19861251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. US characterization of ovarian masses: a meta-analysis. Kinkel K; Hricak H; Lu Y; Tsuda K; Filly RA Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):803-11. PubMed ID: 11110947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI features of ovarian cystic lesions. Park SB; Lee JB J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 40(3):503-15. PubMed ID: 24474469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Computerized tomography and MR tomography in diagnosis of ovarian tumors]. Hamm B Radiologe; 1994 Jul; 34(7):362-9. PubMed ID: 7938483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiological staging of ovarian carcinoma. Moyle P; Addley HC; Sala E Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2010 Oct; 31(5):388-98. PubMed ID: 20974358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of US, CT, and MRI. Togashi K Eur Radiol; 2003 Dec; 13 Suppl 4():L87-104. PubMed ID: 15018172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck]. Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses. Huber S; Medl M; Baumann L; Czembirek H Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):2501-7. PubMed ID: 12174952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT and MRI findings of type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer. Liu D; Zhang L; Indima N; Peng K; Li Q; Hua T; Tang G Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():225-233. PubMed ID: 28583639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The integrated diagnosis of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: echography, color Doppler, computed tomography and magnetic resonance compared]. De Gaetano A; De Franco A; Maresca G; Manfredi R; Barbaro B; Monteforte MG Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):258-69. PubMed ID: 8628940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The added value of PET/Ce-CT/DW-MRI fusion in assessment of hepatic focal lesions: PET/Ce-CT/DW-MRI fusion in hepatic focal lesion. Salem S; Houseni M; Zidan L; Kandil A Nucl Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 42(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 25907467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]