These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17433655)

  • 1. Higher pH and faster decomposition in biowaste composting by increased aeration.
    Sundberg C; Jönsson H
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(3):518-26. PubMed ID: 17433655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of appropriate initial composition and aeration method for co-composting of yard waste and market wastes.
    Aydn GA; Kocasoy G
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2003 Mar; 38(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 12617559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of aeration rate and kinetics of composting some agricultural wastes.
    Kulcu R; Yaldiz O
    Bioresour Technol; 2004 May; 93(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 14987720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of enforced aeration on in-vessel food waste composting.
    Lu SG; Imai T; Li HF; Ukita M; Sekine M; Higuchi T
    Environ Technol; 2001 Oct; 22(10):1177-82. PubMed ID: 11766039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of aeration rate on generated compost quality, using aerated static pile method.
    Rasapoor M; Nasrabadi T; Kamali M; Hoveidi H
    Waste Manag; 2009 Feb; 29(2):570-3. PubMed ID: 18619830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A negative-pressure aeration system for composting food wastes.
    Lin C
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Nov; 99(16):7651-6. PubMed ID: 18353633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of alkyl polyglycoside (APG) on composting of agricultural wastes.
    Zhang F; Gu W; Xu P; Tang S; Xie K; Huang X; Huang Q
    Waste Manag; 2011 Jun; 31(6):1333-8. PubMed ID: 21376559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of static, in-vessel composting of MSW with thermophilic anaerobic digestion and combinations of the two processes.
    Walker L; Charles W; Cord-Ruwisch R
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Aug; 100(16):3799-807. PubMed ID: 19345576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Passive aeration composting of chicken litter: effects of aeration pipe orientation and perforation size on losses of compost elements.
    Ogunwande GA; Osunade JA
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Jan; 92(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 20869159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance characteristics of three aeration systems in the swine manure composting.
    Zhu N; Deng C; Xiong Y; Qian H
    Bioresour Technol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 15288275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Carbon turnover and ammonia emissions during composting of biowaste at different temperatures.
    Eklind Y; Sundberg C; Smårs S; Steger K; Sundh I; Kirchmann H; Jönsson H
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(5):1512-20. PubMed ID: 17766831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbial characterization during composting of biowaste.
    Chroni C; Kyriacou A; Georgaki I; Manios T; Kotsou M; Lasaridi K
    Waste Manag; 2009 May; 29(5):1520-5. PubMed ID: 19167876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Composting rice straw with sewage sludge and compost effects on the soil-plant system.
    Roca-Pérez L; Martínez C; Marcilla P; Boluda R
    Chemosphere; 2009 May; 75(6):781-7. PubMed ID: 19187949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of aeration rate on nitrogen dynamics during composting.
    de Guardia A; Petiot C; Rogeau D; Druilhe C
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(3):575-87. PubMed ID: 17826974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effective pine bark composting with the dome aeration technology.
    Trois C; Polster A
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 16500098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in the chemical and physicochemical properties of the solid fraction of cattle slurry during composting using different aeration strategies.
    Cáceres R; Flotats X; Marfà O
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(10):1081-91. PubMed ID: 16146687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical analyses of compost from composting plants in Brazil.
    Barreira LP; Philippi Junior A; Rodrigues MS; Tenório JA
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(8):1417-22. PubMed ID: 17855069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of different compost extracts using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and thermal analysis.
    Carballo T; Gil MV; Gómez X; González-Andrés F; Morán A
    Biodegradation; 2008 Nov; 19(6):815-30. PubMed ID: 18347917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of composting process on phytotoxicity and speciation of copper, zinc and lead in sewage sludge and swine manure.
    Miaomiao H; Wenhong L; Xinqiang L; Donglei W; Guangming T
    Waste Manag; 2009 Feb; 29(2):590-7. PubMed ID: 18778928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of aeration rate and biodegradability fractionation on composting kinetics.
    de Guardia A; Petiot C; Rogeau D
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 17196812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.