These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17434064)

  • 1. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Chinander MR
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 18175183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets.
    Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Bancroft Brown J; MacMahon A; Mussman M; Olopade OI; Sennett C
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 22246204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Wolverton DE; Zhong W; Cumming S; Olopade OI
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 10659732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location.
    Li H; Giger ML; Huo Z; Olopade OI; Lan L; Weber BL; Bonta I
    Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 15070253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Wolverton DE; Weber BL; Metz CE; Zhong W; Cummings SA
    Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):519-26. PubMed ID: 12409590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel method of determining breast cancer risk using parenchymal textural analysis of mammography images on an Asian cohort.
    Tan M; Mariapun S; Yip CH; Ng KH; Teo SH
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(3):035016. PubMed ID: 30577031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.
    Guo Q; Shao J; Ruiz VF
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jan; 4(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 20033598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
    Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
    Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast mass lesions: computer-aided diagnosis models with mammographic and sonographic descriptors.
    Jesneck JL; Lo JY; Baker JA
    Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):390-8. PubMed ID: 17562812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic pattern analysis: an emerging risk assessment tool.
    Karellas A
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):511-2. PubMed ID: 17434063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
    Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fractal analysis of visual search activity for mass detection during mammographic screening.
    Alamudun F; Yoon HJ; Hudson KB; Morin-Ducote G; Hammond T; Tourassi GD
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):832-846. PubMed ID: 28079249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2 mutation status: a cross-sectional study.
    Gierach GL; Li H; Loud JT; Greene MH; Chow CK; Lan L; Prindiville SA; Eng-Wong J; Soballe PW; Giambartolomei C; Mai PL; Galbo CE; Nichols K; Calzone KA; Olopade OI; Gail MH; Giger ML
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(4):424. PubMed ID: 25159706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms.
    Rangayyan RM; Nguyen TM
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 17021926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as an imaging marker of endogenous hormonal exposure: a preliminary study in a high-risk population.
    Daye D; Keller B; Conant EF; Chen J; Schnall MD; Maidment AD; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 23570938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-scaled morphological features for the characterization of mammographic masses using statistical classification schemes.
    Georgiou H; Mavroforakis M; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 Sep; 41(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 17714924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study on the computerized fractal analysis of architectural distortion in screening mammograms.
    Tourassi GD; Delong DM; Floyd CE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1299-312. PubMed ID: 16481695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.