287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17434064)
1. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Chinander MR
J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 18175183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets.
Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Bancroft Brown J; MacMahon A; Mussman M; Olopade OI; Sennett C
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 22246204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Wolverton DE; Zhong W; Cumming S; Olopade OI
Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 10659732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location.
Li H; Giger ML; Huo Z; Olopade OI; Lan L; Weber BL; Bonta I
Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 15070253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Wolverton DE; Weber BL; Metz CE; Zhong W; Cummings SA
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):519-26. PubMed ID: 12409590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel method of determining breast cancer risk using parenchymal textural analysis of mammography images on an Asian cohort.
Tan M; Mariapun S; Yip CH; Ng KH; Teo SH
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(3):035016. PubMed ID: 30577031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.
Guo Q; Shao J; Ruiz VF
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jan; 4(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 20033598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast mass lesions: computer-aided diagnosis models with mammographic and sonographic descriptors.
Jesneck JL; Lo JY; Baker JA
Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):390-8. PubMed ID: 17562812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic pattern analysis: an emerging risk assessment tool.
Karellas A
Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):511-2. PubMed ID: 17434063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fractal analysis of visual search activity for mass detection during mammographic screening.
Alamudun F; Yoon HJ; Hudson KB; Morin-Ducote G; Hammond T; Tourassi GD
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):832-846. PubMed ID: 28079249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2 mutation status: a cross-sectional study.
Gierach GL; Li H; Loud JT; Greene MH; Chow CK; Lan L; Prindiville SA; Eng-Wong J; Soballe PW; Giambartolomei C; Mai PL; Galbo CE; Nichols K; Calzone KA; Olopade OI; Gail MH; Giger ML
Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(4):424. PubMed ID: 25159706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms.
Rangayyan RM; Nguyen TM
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 17021926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as an imaging marker of endogenous hormonal exposure: a preliminary study in a high-risk population.
Daye D; Keller B; Conant EF; Chen J; Schnall MD; Maidment AD; Kontos D
Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 23570938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-scaled morphological features for the characterization of mammographic masses using statistical classification schemes.
Georgiou H; Mavroforakis M; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
Artif Intell Med; 2007 Sep; 41(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 17714924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A study on the computerized fractal analysis of architectural distortion in screening mammograms.
Tourassi GD; Delong DM; Floyd CE
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1299-312. PubMed ID: 16481695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
