These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17434066)

  • 21. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on full field digital mammograms.
    Wei J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Ge J; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2005 Sep; 32(9):2827-38. PubMed ID: 16266097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM
    Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital mammography: comparison of adaptive and nonadaptive CAD methods for mass detection.
    Qian W; Li L; Clarke L; Clark RA; Thomas J
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):471-80. PubMed ID: 10480043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
    Sheybani EO; Sankar R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mutual information-based template matching scheme for detection of breast masses: from mammography to digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Mazurowski MA; Lo JY; Harrawood BP; Tourassi GD
    J Biomed Inform; 2011 Oct; 44(5):815-23. PubMed ID: 21554985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computer-aided detection of masses at mammography: interactive decision support versus prompts.
    Hupse R; Samulski M; Lobbes MB; Mann RM; Mus R; den Heeten GJ; Beijerinck D; Pijnappel RM; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 23091171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation and comparison of CAD system performance in clinical settings.
    Bornefalk H
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):687-94. PubMed ID: 15935967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computer-aided mass detection in mammography: false positive reduction via gray-scale invariant ranklet texture features.
    Masotti M; Lanconelli N; Campanini R
    Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 19291970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information.
    Tourassi GD; Vargas-Voracek R; Catarious DM; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2123-30. PubMed ID: 12945977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. CAD-aided mammogram training.
    Luo P; Qian W; Romilly P
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):1039-48. PubMed ID: 16087097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support.
    Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Rijken H; Holland R
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S123-6. PubMed ID: 17209117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of performance and reliability of computer-aided detection scheme using content-based image retrieval approach and limited reference database.
    Wang XH; Park SC; Zheng B
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Apr; 24(2):352-9. PubMed ID: 20204448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms.
    Gromet M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 18356428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Incorporation of a set enumeration trees-based classifier into a hybrid computer-assisted diagnosis scheme for mass detection.
    Rymon R; Zheng B; Chang YH; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 9522884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The prediction of breast cancer biopsy outcomes using two CAD approaches that both emphasize an intelligible decision process.
    Elter M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wittenberg T
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4164-72. PubMed ID: 18072480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An ellipse-fitting based method for efficient registration of breast masses on two mammographic views.
    Pu J; Zheng B; Leader JK; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 18383669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An interactive system for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses.
    Wang X; Li L; Liu W; Xu W; Lederman D; Zheng B
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):570-9. PubMed ID: 22234836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mass type-specific sparse representation for mass classification in computer-aided detection on mammograms.
    Kim DH; Lee SH; Ro YM
    Biomed Eng Online; 2013; 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 24564973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.