137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17434158)
1. Error propagation in calculated ratios.
Holmes DT; Buhr KA
Clin Biochem; 2007 Jun; 40(9-10):728-34. PubMed ID: 17434158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The concept of precision extended to the atherogenic index of plasma.
Holmes DT; Frohlich J; Buhr KA
Clin Biochem; 2008 May; 41(7-8):631-5. PubMed ID: 18280809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The detection of problem analytes in a single proficiency test challenge in the absence of the Health Care Financing Administration rule violations.
Cembrowski GS; Hackney JR; Carey N
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 8466413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
Springate SD
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: comparison of bias, precision and consistency using 12 different formulae.
Anderson NG; Jolley IJ; Wells JE
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 30(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 17557378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Critical difference calculations revised: inclusion of variation in standard deviation with analyte concentration.
Jones GR
Ann Clin Biochem; 2009 Nov; 46(Pt 6):517-9. PubMed ID: 19837723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The meaning of the bias uncertainty measure.
Bartley DL
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):519-25. PubMed ID: 18535088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Can the scattering of differences from the target refraction be avoided?].
Janknecht P
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 Oct; 225(10):868-73. PubMed ID: 18951307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Least squares in calibration: dealing with uncertainty in x.
Tellinghuisen J
Analyst; 2010 Aug; 135(8):1961-9. PubMed ID: 20577693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of uncertainty propagation through model parameters and structure.
Patil A; Deng ZQ
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(6):1230-9. PubMed ID: 20861535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical estimation of fetal weight in low resource settings: comparison of Johnson's formula and the palpation method.
Belete W; Gaym A
Ethiop Med J; 2008 Jan; 46(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 18711988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of uncertainty in size-exclusion chromatography with a double detection system (light-scattering and refractive index).
Oliva A; Llabrés M; Fariña JB
Talanta; 2009 May; 78(3):781-9. PubMed ID: 19269428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Allowable limits of analytical error which can guarantee the reliability of reference intervals for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].
Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
Rinsho Byori; 2008 Jul; 56(7):617-21. PubMed ID: 18709995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A practical approach for comparing means of two groups without equal variance assumption.
Wang H; Chow SC
Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(20):3137-51. PubMed ID: 12369087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty of glucose in clinical chemistry.
Berçik Inal B; Koldas M; Inal H; Coskun C; Gümüs A; Döventas Y
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Apr; 1100():223-6. PubMed ID: 17460183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a method for converting venous values of acid-base and oxygenation status to arterial values.
Toftegaard M; Rees SE; Andreassen S
Emerg Med J; 2009 Apr; 26(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 19307387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating and testing interactions in linear regression models when explanatory variables are subject to classical measurement error.
Murad H; Freedman LS
Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4293-310. PubMed ID: 17340676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the uncertainty associated with Widmark's equation as commonly applied in forensic toxicology.
Gullberg RG
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Oct; 172(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17210238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.
Atkinson G; Nevill AM
Sports Med; 1998 Oct; 26(4):217-38. PubMed ID: 9820922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Functional balance and mobility tests in healthy participants: reliability, error and influencing factors.
Busse ME; Tyson SF
Physiother Res Int; 2007 Dec; 12(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 17966109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
