BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17435516)

  • 21. Evaluation of a new tear osmometer for repeatability and accuracy, using 0.5-microL (500-Nanoliter) samples.
    Yildiz EH; Fan VC; Banday H; Ramanathan LV; Bitra RK; Garry E; Asbell PA
    Cornea; 2009 Jul; 28(6):677-80. PubMed ID: 19512902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Oxygen permeability of soft contact lenses in different pH, osmolality and buffering solution.
    Lee SE; Kim SR; Park M
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(5):1037-42. PubMed ID: 26558223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Physical properties of soft contact lens solutions.
    Dalton K; Subbaraman LN; Rogers R; Jones L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Feb; 85(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 18296929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Adverse events and discontinuations during 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):288-92. PubMed ID: 17993823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Delivery of ketotifen fumarate by commercial contact lens materials.
    Soluri A; Hui A; Jones L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 89(8):1140-9. PubMed ID: 22773177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials.
    Senchyna M; Jones L; Louie D; May C; Forbes I; Glasier MA
    Curr Eye Res; 2004 Jan; 28(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 14704911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Santos L; Rodrigues D; Lira M; Oliveira ME; Oliveira R; Vilar EY; Azeredo J
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Jul; 30(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 17291818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contact lens case cleaning procedures affect storage solution pH and osmolality.
    Abengózar-Vela A; Pinto FJ; González-Méijome JM; Ralló M; Serés C; Calonge M; González-García MJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Dec; 88(12):1414-21. PubMed ID: 21912303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model.
    Suwala M; Glasier MA; Subbaraman LN; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 May; 33(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 17502748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relative in vitro rates of attachment and penetration of hydrogel soft contact lenses by haplotypes of fusarium.
    Ahearn DG; Zhang S; Stulting RD; Schwam BL; Simmons RB; Ward MA; Pierce GE; Crow SA
    Cornea; 2009 May; 28(4):447-50. PubMed ID: 19411965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of protein and lipid on neutralization times of hydrogen peroxide care regimens.
    Ngo W; Heynen M; Joyce E; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Nov; 35(6):282-6. PubMed ID: 19713860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bacterial adhesion to worn silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Santos L; Rodrigues D; Lira M; Real Oliveira ME; Oliveira R; Vilar EY; Azeredo J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):520-5. PubMed ID: 18594343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Novel pachometry calibration.
    Moezzi AM; Sin S; Simpson TL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 83(6):366-71. PubMed ID: 16772888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The impact of silicone hydrogel materials on overnight corneal swelling.
    Steffen RB; Schnider CM
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 May; 33(3):115-20. PubMed ID: 17502744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Conjunctival epithelial flaps with 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J; Wolffsohn J; Gilmartin B
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jan; 34(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 18180681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Soft contact lens cleaning: rub or no-rub?
    Cho P; Cheng SY; Chan WY; Yip WK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jan; 29(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 19154280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Imaging protein deposits on contact lens materials.
    Teichroeb JH; Forrest JA; Ngai V; Martin JW; Jones L; Medley J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1151-64. PubMed ID: 19050470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of nonpreserved care solutions on 12 months of daily and extended silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Robertson DM; Petroll WM; Cavanagh HD
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 49(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 18172068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro analysis of the physical properties of contact lens blister pack solutions.
    Menzies KL; Jones L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Apr; 88(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 21187803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retention of conditioning agent hyaluronan on hydrogel contact lenses.
    Scheuer CA; Fridman KM; Barniak VL; Burke SE; Venkatesh S
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2010 Dec; 33 Suppl 1():S2-6. PubMed ID: 21074483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.