BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17436042)

  • 21. Reverse-alignment surgical skills assessment.
    Gould JC; Frydman J
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Apr; 21(4):669-71. PubMed ID: 17285380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laparoscopic skills training using a webcam trainer.
    Chung SY; Landsittel D; Chon CH; Ng CS; Fuchs GJ
    J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):180-3. PubMed ID: 15592070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of viewing axis on laparoscopic performance: a comparison of non-expert and expert laparoscopic surgeons.
    Rhee R; Fernandez G; Bush R; Seymour NE
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Sep; 28(9):2634-40. PubMed ID: 24853838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of a novel simulation model for assessment of laparoscopic camera navigation.
    Brackmann MW; Andreatta P; McLean K; Reynolds RK
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):3033-3039. PubMed ID: 27826776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Construct validity for eye-hand coordination skill on a virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator.
    Yamaguchi S; Konishi K; Yasunaga T; Yoshida D; Kinjo N; Kobayashi K; Ieiri S; Okazaki K; Nakashima H; Tanoue K; Maehara Y; Hashizume M
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Dec; 21(12):2253-7. PubMed ID: 17479319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Simulated laparoscopy using a head-mounted display vs traditional video monitor: an assessment of performance and muscle fatigue.
    Maithel SK; Villegas L; Stylopoulos N; Dawson S; Jones DB
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Mar; 19(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 15624063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of handle design and target location on insertion and aim with a laparoscopic surgical tool.
    Trejo A; Jung MC; Oleynikov D; Hallbeck MS
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Nov; 38(6):745-53. PubMed ID: 17374356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A training tool to assess laparoscopic image navigation task performance in novice camera assistants.
    Alam M; Wilson MSJ; Tang B; Tait IS; Alijani A
    J Surg Res; 2017 Nov; 219():232-237. PubMed ID: 29078887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An ergonomic analysis of the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance.
    Gallagher AG; Al-Akash M; Seymour NE; Satava RM
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Dec; 23(12):2684-91. PubMed ID: 19067048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ideal manipulation angle and instrument length in hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
    Manasnayakorn S; Cuschieri A; Hanna GB
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Apr; 22(4):924-9. PubMed ID: 17704859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Construct and face validity and task workload for laparoscopic camera navigation: virtual reality versus videotrainer systems at the SAGES Learning Center.
    Stefanidis D; Haluck R; Pham T; Dunne JB; Reinke T; Markley S; Korndorffer JR; Arellano P; Jones DB; Scott DJ
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1158-64. PubMed ID: 17149551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of a three-dimensional operating system with skill tests in a pelvic trainer.
    Sun CC; Chiu AW; Chen KK; Chang LS
    Urol Int; 2000; 64(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 10859547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations.
    Korndorffer JR; Clayton JL; Tesfay ST; Brunner WC; Sierra R; Dunne JB; Jones DB; Rege RV; Touchard CL; Scott DJ
    J Surg Res; 2005 Sep; 128(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 15916767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of surgical performance with standard rigid and flexible-tip laparoscopes.
    Perrone JM; Ames CD; Yan Y; Landman J
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Oct; 19(10):1325-8. PubMed ID: 16228857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative study of 2-D and bichanneled 3-D laparoscopic images: Is there a difference?
    Tung KL; Yang GP; Li MK
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2015 Aug; 8(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 26043363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficacy of novel robotic camera vs a standard laparoscopic camera.
    Strong VE; Hogle NJ; Fowler DL
    Surg Innov; 2005 Dec; 12(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 16424951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ergonomic risk associated with assisting in minimally invasive surgery.
    Lee G; Lee T; Dexter D; Godinez C; Meenaghan N; Catania R; Park A
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Jan; 23(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 18815838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Video analysis of endoscopic cutting task performed by one versus two operators.
    Zheng B; Verjee F; Lomax A; MacKenzie CL
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Oct; 19(10):1388-95. PubMed ID: 16151682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimum view distance for laparoscopic surgery.
    El Shallaly G; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 2006 Dec; 20(12):1879-82. PubMed ID: 17031749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Take-Home Training in Laparoscopy.
    Thinggaard E
    Dan Med J; 2017 Apr; 64(4):. PubMed ID: 28385174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.