262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17436512)
1. [The use of forceps in a university hospital unit].
Thoulon JM; Palayer C; Lieux JM; Magnin P
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1974; 69(7-9):487-97. PubMed ID: 17436512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.
Bahl R; Van de Venne M; Macleod M; Strachan B; Murphy DJ
BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Is it legitimate today to perform large rotations with forceps?].
Magnin P; Audra P
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Apr; 79(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 6531595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Materno-fetal morbidity of instrumental deliveries: forceps versus spatulas. About a series of 77 cases].
Tsoyem Mouafou AC; Morel O; Lamy C; Monceau E; Judlin P; Muhlstein J
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Mar; 42(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 22521984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Immediate materno-fetal morbidity in the use of forceps. Comparative study of divergent and crossed forceps].
Walss Rodríguez RJ; Casillas Cantú A
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1984 May; 52(325):121-5. PubMed ID: 6489800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Use and safety of Kielland's forceps in current obstetric practice.
Burke N; Field K; Mujahid F; Morrison JJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):766-70. PubMed ID: 22996093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should we abandon Kielland's forceps?
Cardozo LD; Gibb DM; Studd JW; Cooper DJ
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jul; 287(6388):315-7. PubMed ID: 6409289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vaginosonographical determination of the true conjugate and the transverse diameter of the pelvic inlet.
Deutinger J; Bernaschek G
Arch Gynecol; 1987; 240(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 3300574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Management of persistent posterior occipital presentation. 253 extractions by forceps].
Palaric JC; Bourgeois-Dujols P; Jacquemard F; Poulain P; Grall JY; Giraud JR
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1991; 20(5):723-8. PubMed ID: 1955670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The analisys of complications in forceps delivery in Institutute of Obsterics and Women Disease Medical University of Gdańsk].
Olszewski J; Olszewska H; Królikowska B; Preis K
Ginekol Pol; 2006 Sep; 77(9):700-4. PubMed ID: 17219799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Obstetrical forceps in the "Concepcion Palacios" maternity 1947-56 (5,949 cases of cephalic presentation)].
Orta SN
Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez; 1969; 29(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 5385571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma.
Pavličev M; Romero R; Mitteroecker P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 222(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 31251927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [TIME DISTRIBUTION OF 10.000 DELIVERIES WITHIN THE 24 HOUR PERIOD].
RIPPMANN ET
Gynaecologia; 1964; 158():31-4. PubMed ID: 14188603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of occiput posterior presentation during labor].
Castel P; Bretelle F; D'Ercole C; Blanc J
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Apr; 47(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 30753901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. VE TRIALS FOLLOWED BY CAESAREAN SECTION.
FJAELLBRANT B
Gynaecologia; 1964; 157():161-5. PubMed ID: 14152478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [More on the Kielland forceps].
Lacreta O
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1986; 108(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 3953177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
