These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. [Thierry's spatulas or forceps--a comparison between maternal-fetal morbidities]. Durand-Maison O; Mangin-Meyniel M; Tabard F; Bulot P; Cottenet J; Gobenceaux AS Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 Jan; 44(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 26482834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessment of the predictive value of X-ray pelvimetry and biparietal diameter in cephalopelvic disproportion. Mandry J; Grandjean H; Reme JM; Pastor J; Levade C; Pontonnier G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1983 Jul; 15(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 6617936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery. Al-Suhel R; Gill S; Robson S; Shadbolt B Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 49(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 19780735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Naegele Forceps Delivery and Association between Morbidity and the Number of Forceps Traction Applications: A Retrospective Study. Matsumoto N; Takenaka T; Ikeda N; Yazaki S; Sato Y J Pregnancy; 2015; 2015():483195. PubMed ID: 26425369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy. Hudelist G; Gelle'n J; Singer C; Ruecklinger E; Czerwenka K; Kandolf O; Keckstein J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):875-81. PubMed ID: 15746685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Maternal and neonatal outcome after failed ventouse delivery: comparison of forceps versus cesarean section. Bhide A; Guven M; Prefumo F; Vankalayapati P; Thilaganathan B J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Jul; 20(7):541-5. PubMed ID: 17674268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fetal pelvic index to predict cephalopelvic disproportion - a retrospective clinical cohort study. Korhonen U; Taipale P; Heinonen S Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jun; 94(6):615-21. PubMed ID: 25682690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Indications and technic of operative vaginal delivery in vertex presentation]. Gitsch E; Reinold E Zentralbl Gynakol; 1984; 106(10):653-9. PubMed ID: 6485615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Investigation of cesarean sections at Konya Training and Research Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Department between 2010 and 2015. Inal ZO; Inal HA; Kucukkendirci H; Oruc AS Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):185-190. PubMed ID: 28509319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. X-RAY PELVIMETRY. BARRON LR; HILL RO; LINKLETTER AM Can Med Assoc J; 1964 Dec; 91(23):1209-12. PubMed ID: 14226095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Factors related to the increasing cesarean section rates for cephalopelvic disproportion. Silbar EL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 May; 154(5):1095-8. PubMed ID: 3706435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates. Myers SA; Gleicher N N Engl J Med; 1988 Dec; 319(23):1511-6. PubMed ID: 3185675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An audit of forceps delivery in Trinidad. Roopnarinesingh A; Knowles R J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 May; 22(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 12521496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Forceps at a university hospital. Critical study of the evolution of the procedure]. Berthet J; Rosier P; Racinet C; Girardier M J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1989; 18(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 2600379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]