BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17437442)

  • 1. Robotically assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a transatlantic comparison of techniques and outcomes.
    Chammas MF; Hubert J; Patel VR
    BJU Int; 2007 May; 99(5):1113-7. PubMed ID: 17437442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre.
    Schwentner C; Pelzer A; Neururer R; Springer B; Horninger W; Bartsch G; Peschel R
    BJU Int; 2007 Oct; 100(4):880-5. PubMed ID: 17535275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
    Davenport K; Minervini A; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic robotic-assisted management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in patients with horseshoe kidneys: technique and 1-year follow-up.
    Chammas M; Feuillu B; Coissard A; Hubert J
    BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 16469030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
    Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
    BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
    Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D
    Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.
    Patel V
    Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15992879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome analysis of robotic pyeloplasty: a large single-centre experience.
    Gupta NP; Nayyar R; Hemal AK; Mukherjee S; Kumar R; Dogra PN
    BJU Int; 2010 Apr; 105(7):980-3. PubMed ID: 19874304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The retroperitoneal laparoscopic Hellström technique for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction from a crossing vessel.
    Zhang X; Xu K; Fu B; Zhang J; Lang B; Ai X; Wang B; Shi T; Ma X
    BJU Int; 2007 Dec; 100(6):1335-8. PubMed ID: 17850377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a versatile alternative to open pyeloplasty.
    Srivastava A; Singh P; Maheshwari R; Ansari MS; Dubey D; Kapoor R; Kumar A; Mandhani A
    Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):420-4. PubMed ID: 19996649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concomitant management of renal calculi and pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction with robotic laparoscopic surgery.
    Atug F; Castle EP; Burgess SV; Thomas R
    BJU Int; 2005 Dec; 96(9):1365-8. PubMed ID: 16287459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One trocar assisted pyeloplasty (OTAP): initial experience and codification of a technique.
    Lima M; Tursini S; Ruggeri G; Gargano T; Libri M; Domini M
    Pediatr Med Chir; 2007; 29(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 17461099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status.
    Inagaki T; Rha KH; Ong AM; Kavoussi LR; Jarrett TW
    BJU Int; 2005 Mar; 95 Suppl 2():102-5. PubMed ID: 15720343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.
    Singh I; Hemal AK
    Can J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(2):5099-108. PubMed ID: 20398449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction secondary to crossing vessels-to transpose or not? The robotic experience.
    Boylu U; Oommen M; Lee BR; Thomas R
    J Urol; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1751-5. PubMed ID: 19233419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
    Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
    Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: using reconstructive methods based on intraoperative findings.
    Kawa G; Tatsumi M; Hiura Y; Muguruma K; Kinoshita H; Matsuda T
    Int J Urol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1171-4. PubMed ID: 16984547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of robotics in the management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Atug F; Burgess SV; Castle EP; Thomas R
    Int J Clin Pract; 2006 Jan; 60(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 16409421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transperitoneal left laparoscopic pyeloplasty with transmesocolic access to the pelvi-ureteric junction: technique description and results with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.
    Porpiglia F; Billia M; Volpe A; Morra I; Scarpa RM
    BJU Int; 2008 Apr; 101(8):1024-8. PubMed ID: 18070175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty.
    Olweny EO; Park SK; Tan YK; Gurbuz C; Cadeddu JA; Best SL
    Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 22036645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.