These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17437733)

  • 1. Comparison of magnetic resonance perfusion imaging versus invasive fractional flow reserve for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of epicardial coronary artery stenosis.
    Kühl HP; Katoh M; Buhr C; Krombach GA; Hoffmann R; Rassaf T; Neizel M; Buecker A; Kelm M
    Am J Cardiol; 2007 Apr; 99(8):1090-5. PubMed ID: 17437733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
    Rieber J; Huber A; Erhard I; Mueller S; Schweyer M; Koenig A; Schiele TM; Theisen K; Siebert U; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M; Klauss V
    Eur Heart J; 2006 Jun; 27(12):1465-71. PubMed ID: 16720685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters to detect anatomically and hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
    Futamatsu H; Wilke N; Klassen C; Shoemaker S; Angiolillo DJ; Siuciak A; Morikawa-Futamatsu K; Suzuki N; von Ziegler F; Bass TA; Costa MA
    Am Heart J; 2007 Aug; 154(2):298-305. PubMed ID: 17643580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography and first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of an impaired coronary perfusion in nonsevere coronary stenosis.
    Barmeyer AA; Stork A; Muellerleile K; Schofer AK; Tiburtius C; Koester R; Heitzer T; Adam G; Meinertz T; Lund GK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 27(5):1005-11. PubMed ID: 18425839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of myocardial transmural perfusion gradient by magnetic resonance imaging to fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Pan J; Huang S; Lu Z; Li J; Wan Q; Zhang J; Gao C; Yang X; Wei M
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 May; 115(10):1333-40. PubMed ID: 25796365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the contractile reserve in patients with intermediate coronary lesions: a strain rate imaging study validated by invasive myocardial fractional flow reserve.
    Weidemann F; Jung P; Hoyer C; Broscheit J; Voelker W; Ertl G; Störk S; Angermann CE; Strotmann JM
    Eur Heart J; 2007 Jun; 28(12):1425-32. PubMed ID: 17504804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [X-ray densitometric measurement of myocardial perfusion reserve in symptomatic patients without angiographically detectable coronary stenoses].
    Havers J; Haude M; Erbel R; Spiller P
    Herz; 2008 Apr; 33(3):223-32. PubMed ID: 18568317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
    Costa MA; Shoemaker S; Futamatsu H; Klassen C; Angiolillo DJ; Nguyen M; Siuciak A; Gilmore P; Zenni MM; Guzman L; Bass TA; Wilke N
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Aug; 50(6):514-22. PubMed ID: 17678734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High left ventricular mass index does not limit the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of lesion severity.
    Chhatriwalla AK; Ragosta M; Powers ER; Sarembock IJ; Gimple LW; Fischer JJ; Barringhaus KG; Kramer CM; Samady H
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Nov; 18(11):544-9. PubMed ID: 17090819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whole-heart dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: determination of volumetric myocardial ischaemic burden and coronary lesion location.
    Manka R; Paetsch I; Kozerke S; Moccetti M; Hoffmann R; Schroeder J; Reith S; Schnackenburg B; Gaemperli O; Wissmann L; Wyss CA; Kaufmann PA; Corti R; Boesiger P; Marx N; Lüscher TF; Jahnke C
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(16):2016-24. PubMed ID: 22677136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance perfusion of the myocardium: semiquantitative and quantitative evaluation in comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
    Huber A; Sourbron S; Klauss V; Schaefer J; Bauner KU; Schweyer M; Reiser M; Rummeny E; Rieber J
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Jun; 47(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 22543970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic value of global myocardial perfusion reserve assessment based on coronary sinus flow measurements using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in addition to myocardial stress perfusion imaging.
    Shomanova Z; Florian A; Bietenbeck M; Waltenberger J; Sechtem U; Yilmaz A
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 18(8):851-859. PubMed ID: 28369259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Leung M; Antonis PR; Nasis A; Crossett M; Hope SA; Lehman SJ; Troupis J; DeFrance T; Seneviratne SK
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Jan; 33(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 21810860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of pressure measurement, dobutamine contrast stress echocardiography and SPECT for the evaluation of intermediate coronary stenoses. The COMPRESS trial.
    Rieber J; Jung P; Erhard I; Koenig A; Hacker M; Schiele TM; Segmiller T; Stempfle HU; Theisen K; Siebert U; Klauss V
    Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2004; 6(3-4):142-7. PubMed ID: 16146908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Broadening the applications of fractional flow reserve.
    Helmy T; Callihan R
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Nov; 18(11):550-1. PubMed ID: 17090820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-resolution magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0-Tesla to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve.
    Lockie T; Ishida M; Perera D; Chiribiri A; De Silva K; Kozerke S; Marber M; Nagel E; Rezavi R; Redwood S; Plein S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Jan; 57(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 21185504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Myocardial perfusion reserve assessed by T2-prepared steady-state free precession blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging in comparison to fractional flow reserve.
    Walcher T; Manzke R; Hombach V; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J; Bernhardt P
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 22855554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Plein S; Greenwood JP; Ridgway JP; Cranny G; Ball SG; Sivananthan MU
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 44(11):2173-81. PubMed ID: 15582315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between Angiographic and Physiologic Evaluation of Coronary Artery Narrowings in Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis.
    Di Gioia G; Scarsini R; Strisciuglio T; De Biase C; Zivelonghi C; Franco D; De Bruyne B; Ribichini F; Barbato E
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Jul; 120(1):106-110. PubMed ID: 28483203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemodynamic evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft lesions using fractional flow reserve.
    Aqel R; Zoghbi GJ; Hage F; Dell'Italia L; Iskandrian AE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Oct; 72(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 18814221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.