These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17437815)

  • 21. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
    Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pathological findings and prostate-specific antigen outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.
    Ploussard G; Salomon L; Allory Y; Terry S; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Vacherot F; de la Taille A
    BJU Int; 2010 Jul; 106(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 19930177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
    Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reassessment of the risk factors for biochemical recurrence in D'Amico intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated using radical prostatectomy.
    Narita S; Mitsuzuka K; Tsuchiya N; Koie T; Kawamura S; Ohyama C; Tochigi T; Yamaguchi T; Arai Y; Habuchi T;
    Int J Urol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):1029-35. PubMed ID: 26290306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence.
    Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL
    J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
    Sofer M; Hamilton-Nelson KL; Schlesselman JJ; Soloway MS
    J Clin Oncol; 2002 Apr; 20(7):1853-8. PubMed ID: 11919244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.
    Akand M; Erdogru T; Avci E; Ates M
    Int J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):916-21. PubMed ID: 26212891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis.
    Erdogru T; Teber D; Frede T; Marrero R; Hammady A; Seemann O; Rassweiler J
    Eur Urol; 2004 Sep; 46(3):312-9; discussion 320. PubMed ID: 15306100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
    Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
    Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prognostic value of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Hattori S; Kosaka T; Mizuno R; Kanao K; Miyajima A; Yasumizu Y; Yazawa S; Nagata H; Kikuchi E; Mikami S; Jinzaki M; Nakagawa K; Tanimoto A; Oya M
    BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):741-7. PubMed ID: 23937660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 3-year actuarial biochemical recurrence-free survival following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience from a tertiary referral center in the United States.
    Pavlovich CP; Trock BJ; Sulman A; Wagner AA; Mettee LZ; Su LM
    J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):917-21; discussion 921-2. PubMed ID: 18207191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surgical outcomes for men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate.
    Jaffe J; Stakhovsky O; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G; Rozet F
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):483-7; discussion 487. PubMed ID: 17561162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.
    Barocas DA; Salem S; Kordan Y; Herrell SD; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Cookson MS; Smith JA
    J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6. PubMed ID: 20083261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Carter HB; Peck HJ; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1277-80; discussion 1280-1. PubMed ID: 17698121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of active surveillance on pathology and nerve sparing status.
    Sussman R; Staff I; Tortora J; Champagne A; Meraney A; Kesler SS; Wagner JR
    Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7299-304. PubMed ID: 24978361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on the outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a matched pair analysis.
    Maldonado-Valadez R; Teber D; Erdogru T; Safi KC; Frede T; Rassweiler J
    J Urol; 2006 Jun; 175(6):2092-6. PubMed ID: 16697810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.