These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1743870)
1. A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28 degrees of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter). Funkhouser AT; Fankhauser F Int Ophthalmol; 1991 Sep; 15(5):347-51. PubMed ID: 1743870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the mean defect and mean deviation indices within the central 28 degrees of the glaucomatous visual field. Funkhouser AT; Fankhauser F Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1990; 34(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 2082062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of weighting the "mean defect" visual field index according to threshold variability in the central and midperipheral visual field. Funkhouser A; Fankhauser F Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1991; 229(3):228-31. PubMed ID: 1869056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of different screening methods for the detection of visual field defects in early glaucoma. Marraffa M; Marchini G; Albertini R; Bonomi L Int Ophthalmol; 1989 Jan; 13(1-2):43-5. PubMed ID: 2744954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fluctuation of the differential light threshold at the border of absolute scotomas. Comparison between glaucomatous visual field defects and blind spots. Haefliger IO; Flammer J Ophthalmology; 1991 Oct; 98(10):1529-32. PubMed ID: 1961639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of five methods for estimating general glaucomatous visual field depression. Funkhouser A; Flammer J; Fankhauser F; Hirsbrunner HP Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1992; 230(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 1577286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of central visual field defects in early glaucomatous eyes: Comparison of Humphrey and Octopus perimetry. Roberti G; Manni G; Riva I; Holló G; Quaranta L; Agnifili L; Figus M; Giammaria S; Rastelli D; Oddone F PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186793. PubMed ID: 29077730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry. Dengler-Harles M; Wild JM; Cole MD; O'Neill EC Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1993 Jun; 231(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 8339949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of Peritest automated perimetry and Goldmann perimetry. Hotchkiss ML; Robin AL; Quigley HA; Pollack IP Arch Ophthalmol; 1985 Mar; 103(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 3977715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Problems related to diffuse versus localized loss in the perimetry of glaucomatous visual fields. Funkhouser AT; Fankhauser F; Weale RA Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1992; 230(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 1597291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of structure-function relationship between corresponding retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and Octopus visual field cluster defect values determined by normal and tendency-oriented strategies. Holló G Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 101(2):150-154. PubMed ID: 27107030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: correlation with octopus perimeter indices. Iester M; Mermoud A; Schnyder C Ophthalmology; 2000 Feb; 107(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 10690827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Light-sense, flicker and resolution perimetry in glaucoma: a comparative study. Lachenmayr BJ; Drance SM; Douglas GR; Mikelberg FS Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1991; 229(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 1869060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry. Flammer J; Drance SM; Augustiny L; Funkhouser A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1985 Feb; 26(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 3972500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of asymmetry of visual field loss with optic disc topography in normal-tension glaucoma. Nyman K; Tomita G; Raitta C; Kawamura M Arch Ophthalmol; 1994 Mar; 112(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 8129660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the optic nerve head in high- and low-tension glaucoma. Caprioli J; Spaeth GL Arch Ophthalmol; 1985 Aug; 103(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 4026644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): II. Comparison of optic disk and visual field characteristics. Johnson CA; Sample PA; Zangwill LM; Vasile CG; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 12566017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated kinetic perimetry with two peripheral isopters in glaucoma. Miller KN; Shields MB; Ollie AR Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Sep; 107(9):1316-20. PubMed ID: 2783064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Size Modulation Standard Automated Perimetry and Conventional Standard Automated Perimetry with a 10-2 Test Program in Glaucoma Patients. Hirasawa K; Takahashi N; Satou T; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shoji N Curr Eye Res; 2017 Aug; 42(8):1160-1168. PubMed ID: 28441081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Site and depth of glaucomatous visual field defects in relation to the size of the neuroretinal edge zone of the optic disk in glaucoma without hypertension, simple glaucoma, pigmentary glaucoma. A clinical study with the Octopus perimeter 201 and the optic nerve head analyzer]. Gramer E; Althaus G; Leydhecker W Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1986 Sep; 189(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 3784407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]