These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17438801)

  • 1. Application of flow cytometry for the assessment of preservation and recovery efficiency of bioaerosol samplers spiked with Pantoea agglomerans.
    Rule AM; Kesavan J; Schwab KJ; Buckley TJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Apr; 41(7):2467-72. PubMed ID: 17438801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sampling efficiency and nucleic acid stability during long-term sampling with different bioaerosol samplers.
    Bøifot KO; Skogan G; Dybwad M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 May; 196(6):577. PubMed ID: 38795190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air.
    Chang CW; Chou FC
    Indoor Air; 2011 Aug; 21(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 21198889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
    Mbareche H; Veillette M; Bilodeau GJ; Duchaine C
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive performance evaluation of six bioaerosol samplers based on an aerosol wind tunnel.
    Guo J; Lv M; Liu Z; Qin T; Qiu H; Zhang L; Lu J; Hu L; Yang W; Zhou D
    Environ Int; 2024 Jan; 183():108402. PubMed ID: 38150804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria.
    Jensen PA; Todd WF; Davis GN; Scarpino PV
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Oct; 53(10):660-7. PubMed ID: 1456208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of a foam spatula for sampling surfaces after bioaerosol deposition.
    Lewandowski R; Kozlowska K; Szpakowska M; Stepinska M; Trafny EA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 Feb; 76(3):688-94. PubMed ID: 20023101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of air samplers and filter materials for collection and recovery of airborne norovirus.
    Uhrbrand K; Koponen IK; Schultz AC; Madsen AM
    J Appl Microbiol; 2018 Apr; 124(4):990-1000. PubMed ID: 28921812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of bioaerosol sampling techniques for the detection of Chlamydophila psittaci in contaminated air.
    Van Droogenbroeck C; Van Risseghem M; Braeckman L; Vanrompay D
    Vet Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 135(1-2):31-7. PubMed ID: 18963601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Field Performance of a Novel Passive Bioaerosol Sampler using Polarized Ferroelectric Polymer Films.
    Therkorn J; Thomas N; Scheinbeim J; Mainelis G
    Aerosol Sci Technol; 2017; 51(7):787-800. PubMed ID: 30774180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of high-volume air sampling equipment for viral aerosol sampling during emergency response.
    Cooper C; Slagley J; Lohaus J; Escamilla E; Bliss C; Semler D; Felker D; Smith D; Ott D
    J Emerg Manag; 2014; 12(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 24828912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
    Li K
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Airborne virus sampling: Efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV).
    Zhao Y; Aarnink AJ; Wang W; Fabri T; Groot Koerkamp PW; de Jong MC
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2014; 21(3):464-71. PubMed ID: 25292111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Removal of viable bioaerosol particles with a low-efficiency HVAC filter enhanced by continuous emission of unipolar air ions.
    Huang R; Agranovski I; Pyankov O; Grinshpun S
    Indoor Air; 2008 Apr; 18(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 18333990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bacterial communities in urban aerosols collected with wetted-wall cyclonic samplers and seasonal fluctuations of live and culturable airborne bacteria.
    Ravva SV; Hernlem BJ; Sarreal CZ; Mandrell RE
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Feb; 14(2):473-81. PubMed ID: 22193549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Field testing of a personal size-selective bioaerosol sampler.
    Kenny LC; Bowry A; Crook B; Stancliffe JD
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):393-404. PubMed ID: 10518465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.
    Yao M; Mainelis G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jul; 4(7):514-24. PubMed ID: 17538812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of culture media and sampling methods on Staphylococcus aureus aerosols.
    Chang CW; Wang LJ
    Indoor Air; 2015 Oct; 25(5):488-98. PubMed ID: 25250674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of an efficient viral aerosol collector for higher sampling flow rate.
    Lin XT; Hsu NY; Wang JR; Chen NT; Su HJ; Lin MY
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(4):3884-3893. PubMed ID: 29177778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.