BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17440204)

  • 1. When prosocials act like proselfs in a commons dilemma.
    Brucks WM; Van Lange PA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 May; 33(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 17440204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmentalism as a trait: gauging people's prosocial personality in terms of environmental engagement.
    Kaiser FG; Byrka K
    Int J Psychol; 2011 Feb; 46(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 22044135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mother Teresa versus Ebenezer Scrooge: mortality salience leads proselfs to endorse self-transcendent values (unless proselfs are reassured).
    Joireman J; Duell B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Mar; 31(3):307-20. PubMed ID: 15657447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-benefiting in the allocation of scarce resources: leader-follower effects and the moderating effect of social value orientations.
    van Dijk E; De Cremer D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 16963606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing cooperation in a mixed-motive social dilemma. An fMRI study investigating the role of social value orientation and dispositional trust.
    Emonds G; Declerck CH; Boone C; Seurinck R; Achten R
    Soc Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 9(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 24294906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals.
    Yamagishi T; Matsumoto Y; Kiyonari T; Takagishi H; Li Y; Kanai R; Sakagami M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(24):6394-6399. PubMed ID: 28559334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bad for me or bad for us? Interpersonal orientations and the impact of losses on unethical behavior.
    Reinders Folmer CP; De Cremer D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Jun; 38(6):760-71. PubMed ID: 22378831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Representation of economic preferences in the structure and function of the amygdala and prefrontal cortex.
    Fermin AS; Sakagami M; Kiyonari T; Li Y; Matsumoto Y; Yamagishi T
    Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():20982. PubMed ID: 26876988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Injustice for all or just for me? Social value orientation predicts responses to own versus other's procedures.
    van Prooijen JW; Ståhl T; Eek D; van Lange PA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1247-58. PubMed ID: 22700243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spontaneous cooperation for prosocials, but not for proselfs: Social value orientation moderates spontaneous cooperation behavior.
    Mischkowski D; Glöckner A
    Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():21555. PubMed ID: 26876773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trust as commodity: social value orientation affects the neural substrates of learning to cooperate.
    Lambert B; Declerck CH; Emonds G; Boone C
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 12(4):609-617. PubMed ID: 28119509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The power of subliminal and supraliminal eye contact on social decision making: An individual-difference perspective.
    Luo Y; Zhang S; Tao R; Geng H
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Feb; 40():131-40. PubMed ID: 26821242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Promoting cooperation and trust in "noisy" situations: the power of generosity.
    Klapwijk A; Van Lange PA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):83-103. PubMed ID: 19210066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of social value orientations on fairness judgments.
    Anderson WD; Patterson ML
    J Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 148(2):223-45. PubMed ID: 18512420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No place to hide: when shame causes proselfs to cooperate.
    Declerck CH; Boone C; Kiyonari T
    J Soc Psychol; 2014; 154(1):74-88. PubMed ID: 24689338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The excluded player in coalition formation.
    van Beest I; Wilke H; van Dijk E
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Feb; 29(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 15272951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to cope with "noise" in social dilemmas: the benefits of communication.
    Tazelaar MJ; Van Lange PA; Ouwerkerk JW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Dec; 87(6):845-59. PubMed ID: 15598110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What other's disappointment may do to selfish people: emotion and social value orientation in a negotiation context.
    Van Kleef GA; Van Lange PA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1084-95. PubMed ID: 18524971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to overcome the detrimental effects of noise in social interaction: the benefits of generosity.
    Van Lange PA; Ouwerkerk JW; Tazelaar MJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 May; 82(5):768-80. PubMed ID: 12003476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When sanctions fail to increase cooperation in social dilemmas: considering the presence of an alternative option to defect.
    Mulder LB; van Dijk E; De Cremer D; Wilke HA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1312-24. PubMed ID: 16963603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.