These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17440206)

  • 1. Interfering with inferential, but not associative, processes underlying spontaneous trait inference.
    Crawford MT; Skowronski JJ; Stiff C; Scherer CR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 May; 33(5):677-90. PubMed ID: 17440206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linking versus thinking: evidence for the different associative and attributional bases of spontaneous trait transference and spontaneous trait inference.
    Carlston DE; Skowronski JJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Dec; 89(6):884-98. PubMed ID: 16393022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spontaneous trait inference and spontaneous trait transference are both unaffected by prior evaluations of informants.
    Zengel B; Ambler JK; McCarthy RJ; Skowronski JJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2017; 157(3):382-387. PubMed ID: 27220061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The good, the strong, and the accurate: preschoolers' evaluations of informant attributes.
    Fusaro M; Corriveau KH; Harris PL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Dec; 110(4):561-74. PubMed ID: 21802693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spontaneous evaluative inferences and their relationship to spontaneous trait inferences.
    Schneid ED; Carlston DE; Skowronski JJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 May; 108(5):681-96. PubMed ID: 25915135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Associative and spontaneous appraisal processes independently contribute to anger elicitation in daily life.
    Wilkowski BM; Robinson MD
    Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 20364894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spontaneous trait transference: communicators taken on the qualities they describe in others.
    Skowronski JJ; Carlston DE; Mae L; Crawford MT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1998 Apr; 74(4):837-48. PubMed ID: 9569648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The letter of recommendation effect in informant ratings of personality.
    Leising D; Erbs J; Fritz U
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Apr; 98(4):668-82. PubMed ID: 20307137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When being right is not enough: four-year-olds distinguish knowledgeable informants from merely accurate informants.
    Einav S; Robinson EJ
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1250-3. PubMed ID: 21881060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thinking about oneself and others: the relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition.
    Cross SE; Morris ML; Gore JS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Mar; 82(3):399-418. PubMed ID: 11902624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mentalizing and Marr: an information processing approach to the study of social cognition.
    Mitchell JP
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1079(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 16473339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferring the mental processes of other minds.
    Anderson ER; Yoder CY; Herrmann DJ; Johnson TJ; Gennaro RJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2003 Jun; 143(3):355-73. PubMed ID: 12846518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do individuals with autism spectrum disorders infer traits from behavior?
    Ramachandran R; Mitchell P; Ropar D
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2009 Jul; 50(7):871-8. PubMed ID: 19298473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The development of spontaneous trait inferences about the actor and spontaneous trait transferences about the informant: Evidence from children aged 8-13 years.
    Wang M; Yan B; Yang F; Zhao Y
    Int J Psychol; 2018 Aug; 53(4):269-277. PubMed ID: 27405877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inside the mind reader's tool kit: projection and stereotyping in mental state inference.
    Ames DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Sep; 87(3):340-53. PubMed ID: 15382984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive processes in stereotype formation: the role of correct contingency learning for biased group judgments.
    Meiser T; Hewstone M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Nov; 87(5):599-614. PubMed ID: 15535774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Self and informant perception of clinical manifestations of Alzheimer dementia: results of a structured interview (CAMDEX)].
    Förstl H; Geiger-Kabisch C; Sattel H; Besthorn C; Schreiter-Gasser U; Abrahams CM; Biedert S
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 1996 Jun; 64(6):228-33. PubMed ID: 8766996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inferences are for doing: the impact of approach and avoidance states on the generation of spontaneous trait inferences.
    Crawford MT; McCarthy RJ; Kjærstad HL; Skowronski JJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Mar; 39(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 23314230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When I think about me and simulate you: medial rostral prefrontal cortex and self-referential processes.
    Benoit RG; Gilbert SJ; Volle E; Burgess PW
    Neuroimage; 2010 Apr; 50(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 20045478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories.
    Uleman JS; Adil Saribay S; Gonzalez CM
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2008; 59():329-60. PubMed ID: 17854284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.