217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17440261)
1. Computing confidence intervals of item fit statistics in the family of Rasch models using the bootstrap method.
Su YH; Sheu CF; Wang WC
J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(2):190-203. PubMed ID: 17440261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
Smith RM; Suh KK
J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the Bootstrap Method to Evaluate the Critical Range of Misfit for Polytomous Rasch Fit Statistics.
Seol H
Psychol Rep; 2016 Jun; 118(3):937-56. PubMed ID: 27207735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identifying measurement disturbance effects using Rasch item fit statistics and the Logit Residual Index.
Mount RE; Schumacker RE
J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(4):338-50. PubMed ID: 9803719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An empirical study on the relationship between teacher's judgments and fit statistics of the partial credit model.
Baek SG; Kim HS
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 19299887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The family approach to assessing fit in Rasch measurement.
Smith RM; Plackner C
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):424-37. PubMed ID: 19934529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Iterative Parametric Bootstrap Approach to Evaluating Rater Fit.
Guo W; Wind SA
Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Jul; 45(5):315-330. PubMed ID: 34565938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability of INFIT and OUTFIT Compared to Simulated Estimates in Applied Setting.
Hodge KJ; Morgan GB
J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(4):383-392. PubMed ID: 29252207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A critique of Rasch residual fit statistics.
Karabatsos G
J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):152-76. PubMed ID: 12029176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finding confidence limits on population growth rates: bootstrap and analytic methods.
Picard N; Chagneau P; Mortier F; Bar-Hen A
Math Biosci; 2009 May; 219(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19249319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-parametric bootstrap confidence intervals for the intraclass correlation coefficient.
Ukoumunne OC; Davison AC; Gulliford MC; Chinn S
Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3805-21. PubMed ID: 14673940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Content development of the Optometric Patient Anxiety Scale.
Court H; Greenland K; Margrain TH
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):729-37. PubMed ID: 17700326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: a robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case.
Algina J; Keselman HJ; Penfield RD
Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 16221031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The construction and implementation of user-defined fit tests for use with marginal maximum likelihood estimation and generalized item response models.
Adams RJ; Wu ML
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):355-70. PubMed ID: 19934525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model.
Smith RM; Schumacker RE; Bush MJ
J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 9661732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Corrected Rasch asymptotic standard errors for person ability estimates.
Smith RM
J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(4):351-64. PubMed ID: 9803720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advanced statistics: bootstrapping confidence intervals for statistics with "difficult" distributions.
Haukoos JS; Lewis RJ
Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Apr; 12(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 15805329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Infit and Outfit: Interpreting Statistical Significance and Magnitude of Misfit in Conjunction.
DeMars CE
J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(2):163-177. PubMed ID: 28961152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
