These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test: the endocervical component. Selvaggi SM; Guidos BJ Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10907927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison. Chacho MS; Mattie ME; Schwartz PE Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 12811853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy. Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling. Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices. Rinas AC; Mittman BW; Le LV; Hartmann K; Cayless J; Singh HK Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16514841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling. Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ThinPrep Pap Test promotes detection of glandular lesions of the endocervix. Bai H; Sung CJ; Steinhoff MM Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 10907926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears. Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases. Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix. Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush. Lo L; Jordan J Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device. Tyau L; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Edmonds P J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method]. Ivanov S Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler. Ferenczy A; Robitaille J; Guralnick M; Shatz R J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear. Marchand L; Mundt M; Klein G; Agarwal SC WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 16218317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ThinPrep detection of cervical and endometrial adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. Schorge JO; Hossein Saboorian M; Hynan L; Ashfaq R Cancer; 2002 Dec; 96(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 12478681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears. Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DCS liquid-based system is more effective than conventional smears to diagnosis of cervical lesions: study in high-risk population with biopsy-based confirmation. Longatto Filho A; Pereira SM; Di Loreto C; Utagawa ML; Makabe S; Sakamoto Maeda MY; Marques JA; Santoro CL; Castelo A Gynecol Oncol; 2005 May; 97(2):497-500. PubMed ID: 15863150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]