339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17440283)
1. Discriminating ability of Humphrey matrix perimetry in early glaucoma patients.
Hong S; Chung W; Hong YJ; Seong GJ
Ophthalmologica; 2007; 221(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 17440283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early glaucoma detection using the Humphrey Matrix Perimeter, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and retinal nerve fiber layer photography.
Hong S; Ahn H; Ha SJ; Yeom HY; Seong GJ; Hong YJ
Ophthalmology; 2007 Feb; 114(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 17270671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of conventional and pattern discrimination perimetry in a prospective study of glaucoma patients.
Ansari I; Chauhan BC; McCormick TA; LeBlanc RP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Dec; 41(13):4150-7. PubMed ID: 11095608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography (StratusOCT).
Nouri-Mahdavi K; Nikkhou K; Hoffman DC; Law SK; Caprioli J
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 18414102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual field testing with the new Humphrey Matrix: a comparison between the FDT N-30 and Matrix N-30-F tests.
Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Felletti M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 16704697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.
Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Hyman L; Leske MC;
Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2271-6. PubMed ID: 19854514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma.
Parikh RS; Parikh S; Sekhar GC; Kumar RS; Prabakaran S; Babu JG; Thomas R
Ophthalmology; 2007 Dec; 114(12):2238-43. PubMed ID: 17561260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between GDx VCC parameter and achromatic perimetry in glaucoma patients.
Iester M; Perdicchi A; De Feo F; Fiesoletti E; Amodeo S; Sanna G; Leonardi A; Calabria G
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 16865003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discriminating between normal and glaucoma-damaged eyes with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.
Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Larrosa JM; Polo V; PajarÃn AB; Honrubia FM
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):775-781.e2. PubMed ID: 17870171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
