These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17440666)
1. Circumcision complications associated with the Plastibell device. Lazarus J; Alexander A; Rode H S Afr Med J; 2007 Mar; 97(3):192-3. PubMed ID: 17440666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of complications of circumcision by 'Plastibell device technique' in male neonates and infants. Moosa FA; Khan FW; Rao MH J Pak Med Assoc; 2010 Aug; 60(8):664-7. PubMed ID: 20726200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complications of circumcision using the Plastibell device. Millar AJ; Roberts D S Afr Med J; 1987 Sep; 72(6):438-9. PubMed ID: 3660140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ten years experience with a novel modification of plastibell circumcision. Hammed A; Helal AA; Badway R; Goda SH; Yehya A; Razik MA; Elshamy A; Elsamahy O Afr J Paediatr Surg; 2014; 11(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 24841023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Circumcision: postoperative complications that required reoperation. Talini C; Antunes LA; Carvalho BCN; Schultz KL; Del Valle MHCP; Aranha Junior AA; Cosenza WRT; Amarante ACM; Silveira AED Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2018; 16(3):eAO4241. PubMed ID: 30110068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective evaluation of plastibell® circumcision in older children. Bastos Netto JM; Gonçalves de Araújo J; Noronha MF; Passos BR; Lopes HE; Bessa Jd; Figueiredo AA Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 24054384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acquired phimosis after plastibell circumcision: a preventable consequence. Kidger EA; Haider N; Qazi A Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2012 Sep; 94(6):e186-8. PubMed ID: 22943316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Circumcision with the Plastibell device. A long-term follow-up. Sörensen SM; Sörensen MR Int Urol Nephrol; 1988; 20(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 3384610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Partial circumcision by the Plastibell method in 245 boys]. Bernstein IT; Sørensen JS Ugeskr Laeger; 1988 Jun; 150(23):1412-3. PubMed ID: 3388534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of a Plastibell device in neonatal circumcision in 2,000 instances. al-Samarrai AY; Mofti AB; Crankson SJ; Jawad A; Haque K; al-Meshari A Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Oct; 167(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 3047894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neonatal circumcision: a ten-year overview: with comparison of the Gomco clamp and the Plastibell device. Gee WF; Ansell JS Pediatrics; 1976 Dec; 58(6):824-7. PubMed ID: 995507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized trial to assess childhood circumcision with the Plastibell device compared to a conventional dissection technique. Fraser IA; Allen MJ; Bagshaw PF; Johnstone M Br J Surg; 1981 Aug; 68(8):593-5. PubMed ID: 7023597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Newborn circumcision using the Plastibell device: an audit of practice. Duncan ND; Dundas SE; Brown B; Pinnock-Ramsaran C; Badal G West Indian Med J; 2004 Jan; 53(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 15114889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the Plastibell Device. Dwyer M; Peffer N; Fuller T; Cannon G Urology; 2016 Mar; 89():134-6. PubMed ID: 26657690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective randomized trial comparing dissection with Plastibell® circumcision. Bastos Netto JM; de Araújo JG; de Almeida Noronha MF; Passos BR; de Bessa J; Figueiredo AA J Pediatr Urol; 2010 Dec; 6(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 20153700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. re: Ruptured bladder following circumcision using the Plastibell device. L.D. Jee and A.J.W. Millar. Br. J. Urol., 65, 216-217, 1990. Khanna S Br J Urol; 1991 Aug; 68(2):219. PubMed ID: 1884163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]