BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17441024)

  • 1. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of the current status.
    Shah KK; Louie M; Thaly RK; Patel VR
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Mar; 3():35-40. PubMed ID: 17441024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
    Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
    BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.
    Singh I; Hemal AK
    Can J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(2):5099-108. PubMed ID: 20398449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic pyeloplasty: a critical appraisal.
    Badwan K; Bhayani S
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Mar; 3():20-2. PubMed ID: 17441021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Lee RS; Borer JG
    Curr Opin Urol; 2006 Jul; 16(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 16770130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.
    Patel V
    Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15992879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Technical aspects of laparoscopic robot-assisted pyeloplasty].
    Ferhi K; Rouprêt M; Rode J; Misraï V; Lebeau T; Richard F; Vaessen C
    Prog Urol; 2009 Oct; 19(9):606-10. PubMed ID: 19800549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population.
    Casale P
    Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 19057224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair.
    Hemal AK; Mishra S; Mukharjee S; Suryavanshi M
    Int J Urol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):744-6. PubMed ID: 18786197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
    Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D
    Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic pyeloplasty using internet protocol and satellite network-based telesurgery.
    Nguan CY; Morady R; Wang C; Harrison D; Browning D; Rayman R; Luke PP
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Mar; 4(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 18265415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.
    Riachy E; Cost NG; Defoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Noh PH
    J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey.
    Freilich DA; Penna FJ; Nelson CP; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
    J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):704-8. PubMed ID: 20022046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
    Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of robotics for ureteral pelvic junction obstruction and ureteral pathology.
    Leveillee RJ; Williams SK
    Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 19057222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Totally minimally invasive robot-assisted unstented pyeloplasty using the Zeus Microwrist Surgical System: an animal study.
    Lorincz A; Knight CG; Kant AJ; Langenburg SE; Rabah R; Gidell K; Dawe E; Klein MD; McLorie G
    J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Feb; 40(2):418-22. PubMed ID: 15750940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty.
    Olweny EO; Park SK; Tan YK; Gurbuz C; Cadeddu JA; Best SL
    Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 22036645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic foregut surgery.
    Ito F; Gould JC
    Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 17520645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned.
    Kutikov A; Nguyen M; Guzzo T; Canter D; Casale P
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2237-9; discussion 2239-40. PubMed ID: 17070302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
    Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
    Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.