350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17441235)
1. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views.
van Engeland S; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3203-12. PubMed ID: 17022213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Joint two-view information for computerized detection of microcalcifications on mammograms.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Ge J; Wei J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2574-85. PubMed ID: 16898462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views.
Gupta S; Markey MK
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1598-606. PubMed ID: 16013719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided detection of breast masses: four-view strategy for screening mammography.
Wei J; Chan HP; Zhou C; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1867-76. PubMed ID: 21626920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.
Wang X; Li L; Xu W; Liu W; Lederman D; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 22173323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Developing a new case based computer-aided detection scheme and an adaptive cueing method to improve performance in detecting mammographic lesions.
Tan M; Aghaei F; Wang Y; Zheng B
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(2):358-376. PubMed ID: 27997380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bilateral analysis based false positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection.
Wu YT; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Ge J; Shi J; Zhang Y; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3334-44. PubMed ID: 17879797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses.
Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams GS; Lu AH; Wallace LP; Maitz GS; Gur D
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3135-43. PubMed ID: 17022205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of normal tissue context in computer-aided detection of masses in mammograms.
Hupse R; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Dec; 28(12):2033-41. PubMed ID: 19666331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information.
Paquerault S; Petrick N; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 11865995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An ellipse-fitting based method for efficient registration of breast masses on two mammographic views.
Pu J; Zheng B; Leader JK; Gur D
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 18383669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms: dual system approach with two-view analysis.
Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4451-60. PubMed ID: 19928076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing Case-based detection performance in a multiview CAD system for mammography.
Samulski M; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Apr; 30(4):1001-9. PubMed ID: 21233045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided detection schemes: the effect of limiting the number of cued regions in each case.
Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams G; Shindel B; Catullo V; Good WF; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 14975949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
