BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17441248)

  • 1. An anatomically realistic lung model for Monte Carlo-based dose calculations.
    Liang L; Larsen EW; Chetty IJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):1013-25. PubMed ID: 17441248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photon beam relative dose validation of the DPM Monte Carlo code in lung-equivalent media.
    Chetty IJ; Charland PM; Tyagi N; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Bielajew AF
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):563-73. PubMed ID: 12722808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variations of lung density and geometry on inhomogeneity correction algorithms: a Monte Carlo dosimetric evaluation.
    Chow JC; Leung MK; Van Dyk J
    Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3619-30. PubMed ID: 19746796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a commercial MRI Linac based Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm with GEANT4.
    Ahmad SB; Sarfehnia A; Paudel MR; Kim A; Hissoiny S; Sahgal A; Keller B
    Med Phys; 2016 Feb; 43(2):894-907. PubMed ID: 26843250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
    Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments.
    Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
    Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2705-17. PubMed ID: 12462739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetric advantage of using 6 MV over 15 MV photons in conformal therapy of lung cancer: Monte Carlo studies in patient geometries.
    Wang L; Yorke E; Desobry G; Chui CS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11818004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
    Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in-depth Monte Carlo study of lateral electron disequilibrium for small fields in ultra-low density lung: implications for modern radiation therapy.
    Disher B; Hajdok G; Gaede S; Battista JJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(6):1543-59. PubMed ID: 22391122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of inhomogeneity correction algorithms in small photon fields.
    Jones AO; Das IJ
    Med Phys; 2005 Mar; 32(3):766-76. PubMed ID: 15839349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental verification of lung dose with radiochromic film: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations and commercially available treatment planning systems.
    Paelinck L; Reynaert N; Thierens H; De Neve W; De Wagter C
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(9):2055-69. PubMed ID: 15843736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo treatment planning system.
    Ma CM; Mok E; Kapur A; Pawlicki T; Findley D; Brain S; Forster K; Boyer AL
    Med Phys; 1999 Oct; 26(10):2133-43. PubMed ID: 10535630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determining the incident electron fluence for Monte Carlo-based photon treatment planning using a standard measured data set.
    Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Libby B; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 12722809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advanced Collapsed cone Engine dose calculations in tissue media for COMS eye plaques loaded with I-125 seeds.
    Morrison H; Menon G; Larocque MP; van Veelen B; Niatsetski Y; Weis E; Sloboda RS
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3349-3360. PubMed ID: 29729009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose enhancement in radiotherapy of small lung tumors using inline magnetic fields: A Monte Carlo based planning study.
    Oborn BM; Ge Y; Hardcastle N; Metcalfe PE; Keall PJ
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):368. PubMed ID: 26745930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward automated and personalized organ dose determination in CT examinations - A comparison of two tissue characterization models for Monte Carlo organ dose calculation with a Therapy Planning System.
    Källman HE; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):1012-1023. PubMed ID: 30582891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo dose calculations for a 6-MV photon beam in a thorax phantom.
    Farajollahi A; Mesbahi A
    Radiat Med; 2006 May; 24(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 16958400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
    Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the truebeam linac using a CAD to Geant4 geometry implementation: dose and IAEA-compliant phase space calculations.
    Constantin M; Perl J; LoSasso T; Salop A; Whittum D; Narula A; Svatos M; Keall PJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4018-24. PubMed ID: 21858999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrospective monte carlo dose calculations with limited beam weight information.
    Lindsay PE; El Naqa I; Hope AJ; Vicic M; Cui J; Bradley JD; Deasy JO
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):334-46. PubMed ID: 17278519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.