BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17441255)

  • 21. Characteristic performance evaluation of a photon counting Si strip detector for low dose spectral breast CT imaging.
    Cho HM; Barber WC; Ding H; Iwanczyk JS; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091903. PubMed ID: 25186390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Power spectrum analysis of the x-ray scatter signal in mammography and breast tomosynthesis projections.
    Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Fei B
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101905. PubMed ID: 24089907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of time-efficient reconstruction methods in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Svahn TM; Houssami N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):331-6. PubMed ID: 25855075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating the sensitivity of the optimization of acquisition geometry to the choice of reconstruction algorithm in digital breast tomosynthesis through a simulation study.
    Zeng R; Park S; Bakic P; Myers KJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 60(3):1259-88. PubMed ID: 25591807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitative image quality measurements of a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2013 Dec; 185(12):1188-94. PubMed ID: 23888475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of multi-directional MTF for breast tomosynthesis.
    Samei E; Murphy S; Richard S
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Mar; 58(5):1649-61. PubMed ID: 23422248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In-plane image quality and NPWE detectability index in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Monnin P; Verdun FR; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095013. PubMed ID: 32191923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Imaging performance of phase-contrast breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation and a CdTe photon-counting detector.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Golosio B; Oliva P; Spandre G; Di Lillo F; Fedon C; Longo R; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 27160829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of source blur on digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
    Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5572-5592. PubMed ID: 31494953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multigrid reconstruction with block-iterative updates for breast tomosynthesis.
    Michielsen K; Nuyts J
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6537-48. PubMed ID: 26520744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. VOLUMETRIC LOCALISATION OF DENSE BREAST TISSUE USING BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS DATA.
    Dustler M; Petersson H; Timberg P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):392-7. PubMed ID: 26922782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Characterization of photon-counting multislit breast tomosynthesis.
    Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 29159881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of clinical full field digital mammography with the task specific system-model-based Fourier Hotelling observer (SMFHO) SNR.
    Liu H; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Benevides L; Gu S; Kyprianou IS
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051907. PubMed ID: 24784386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization.
    Zhao C; Kanicki J; Konstantinidis AC; Patel T
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Monte-Carlo simulation of a slot-scanning X-ray imaging system.
    Kulkarni M; Dendere R; Nicolls F; Steiner S; Douglas TS
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):284-9. PubMed ID: 26725256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. VALIDATION OF A SIMULATION PROCEDURE FOR GENERATING BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS PROJECTION IMAGES.
    Petersson H; Warren LM; Tingberg A; Dustler M; Timberg P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):386-91. PubMed ID: 26842713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development, validation, and simplification of a scanner-specific CT simulator.
    Tunissen SAM; Oostveen LJ; Moriakov N; Teuwen J; Michielsen K; Smit EJ; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2081-2095. PubMed ID: 37656009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. X-ray source motion blur modeling and deblurring with generative diffusion for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Gao M; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(11):. PubMed ID: 38640913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Grating-based phase contrast tomosynthesis imaging: proof-of-concept experimental studies.
    Li K; Ge Y; Garrett J; Bevins N; Zambelli J; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011903. PubMed ID: 24387511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.