154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17441852)
1. Recommendation of appropriate amounts of petrolatum preparation to be applied at patch testing.
Bruze M; Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 May; 56(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 17441852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which test chambers should be used for acetone, ethanol, and water solutions when patch testing?
Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):134-6. PubMed ID: 17627666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variation in the amount of petrolatum preparation applied at patch testing.
Bruze M; Frick-Engfeldt M; Gruvberger B; Isaksson M
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jan; 56(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 17177708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Establishing aluminium contact allergy.
Siemund I; Zimerson E; Hindsén M; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Sep; 67(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 22594839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Allergic contact dermatitis from iodine preparations: a conundrum.
Lee SK; Zhai H; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 15859989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series.
Bruze M; Andersen KE; Goossens A; ;
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 18279149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes.
Löffler H; Freyschmidt-Paul P; Effendy I; Maibach HI
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 11244137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of the compatibility between aluminium Finn Chambers and various mercurials dissolved in water or dispersed in petrolatum.
Lachapelle JM; Douka MA
Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1985; 33(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3987516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of patch type on the cumulative irritation potential of 4 test materials.
Bagley DM; Boisits EK; Spriggs TL; Schwartz S
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11244136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A contemporary Fischer-Maibach investigation: variations in patch test delivery systems and implications for standardization.
Hamann D; Hamann CR; Hamann C
Dermatitis; 2013; 24(6):302-12. PubMed ID: 24201463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of fragrance patch test preparations applied in test chambers.
Mowitz M; Zimerson E; Svedman C; Bruze M
Br J Dermatol; 2012 Oct; 167(4):822-7. PubMed ID: 22803625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing reproducibility for clinical studies involving patch testing and application of topical preparations.
Jaimes JP; Liu A; Bhardwaj SS; Warshaw EM
Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 17(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 16956465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of three different techniques for application of water solutions to Finn Chambers®.
Frick-Engfeldt M; Gruvberger B; Isaksson M; Hauksson I; Pontén A; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):284-8. PubMed ID: 20946457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linalool--a significant contact sensitizer after air exposure.
Christensson JB; Matura M; Gruvberger B; Bruze M; Karlberg AT
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Jan; 62(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 20136877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elicitation response characteristics to permanent hair dye in paraphenylenediamine-allergic volunteers.
Jowsey IR; Basketter DA; McFadden JP; Kullavanijaya P; Duangdeeden I
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Dec; 55(6):330-4. PubMed ID: 17101006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of aluminium release from Finn chambers under different in vitro test conditions of relevance for patch testing.
Hedberg YS; Wei Z; Matura M
Contact Dermatitis; 2020 Nov; 83(5):380-386. PubMed ID: 32484247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from ethyl cyanoacrylate.
Bruze M; Björkner B; Lepoittevin JP
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Mar; 32(3):156-9. PubMed ID: 7774187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of Finn Chambers and T.R.U.E. test methodologies in detecting the relevant allergens inducing contact dermatitis.
Suneja T; Belsito DV
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Dec; 45(6):836-9. PubMed ID: 11712026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sodium tetrachloropalladate (Na2[PdCl4]) as an improved test salt for palladium allergy patch testing.
Muris J; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ; Rustemeyer T
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jan; 58(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 18154558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patch test dose-response study of p-phenylenediamine: thresholds and anatomical regional differences.
Sosted H; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Mar; 54(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 16524437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
