These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17441852)

  • 41. Tixocortol pivalate: what is the right concentration?
    Kalavala M; Statham BN; Green CM; King C; Ormerod AD; Sansom J; English JS; Wilkinson MS; Horne H; Gawkrodger D
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jul; 57(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 17577357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. More positive patch test reactions with larger test chambers? Results from a study group of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
    Brasch J; Szliska C; Grabbe J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Sep; 37(3):118-20. PubMed ID: 9330817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The association between size of test chamber and patch test reaction: a statistical reanalysis.
    Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A; Geier J; Brasch J; Uter W
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Jan; 40(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 9928799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Patch test results with metals and meteorological conditions.
    Hegewald J; Uter W; Kranke B; Schnuch A; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2008; 147(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 18594154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The reaction index and positivity ratio revisited.
    Andersen KE; Andersen F
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jan; 58(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18154555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Delayed patch test reading after 5 days: the Mayo Clinic experience.
    Davis MD; Bhate K; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Richardson DM; Weaver AL
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 59(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 18513826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Allergic contact dermatitis in 136 children patch tested between 2000 and 2006.
    Hammonds LM; Hall VC; Yiannias JA
    Int J Dermatol; 2009 Mar; 48(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 19261015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contact dermatitis with clostridiopeptidase A contained in Noruxol ointment.
    Foti C; Conserva A; Casulli C; Scrimieri V; Pepe ML; Quaranta D
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jun; 56(6):361-2. PubMed ID: 17577383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Is the irritant benzalkonium chloride a contact allergen? A contribution to the ongoing debate from a clinical perspective.
    Uter W; Lessmann H; Geier J; Schnuch A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jun; 58(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 18503686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Allergic contact dermatitis secondary to the use of aluminium Finn Chambers®.
    King N; Moffitt D
    Contact Dermatitis; 2018 May; 78(5):365-366. PubMed ID: 29611265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Allergy to tea tree oil: retrospective review of 41 cases with positive patch tests over 4.5 years.
    Rutherford T; Nixon R; Tam M; Tate B
    Australas J Dermatol; 2007 May; 48(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 17535193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reproducibility of patch test results: comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber test results.
    Gollhausen R; Przybilla B; Ring J
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):843-6. PubMed ID: 2600211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sensitization to petrolatum: an unusual cause of false-positive drug patch-tests.
    Ulrich G; Schmutz JL; Trechot P; Commun N; Barbaud A
    Allergy; 2004 Sep; 59(9):1006-9. PubMed ID: 15291911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Patch tests in children with suspected allergic contact dermatitis: a prospective study and review of the literature.
    de Waard-van der Spek FB; Oranje AP
    Dermatology; 2009; 218(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 18946202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Decreasing trends in methyldibromo glutaronitrile contact allergy--following regulatory intervention.
    Johansen JD; Veien N; Laurberg G; Avnstorp C; Kaaber K; Andersen KE; Paulsen E; Sommerlund M; Thormann J; Nielsen NH; Vissing S; Kristensen O; Kristensen B; Agner T; Menné T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jul; 59(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 18537990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Primin in the European standard patch test series for 20 years.
    Zachariae C; Engkilde K; Johansen JD; Menné T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jun; 56(6):344-6. PubMed ID: 17577376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis.
    Keir J; English J; Fergie N
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 May; 123(5):558-9. PubMed ID: 19138454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The European Surveillance System of Contact Allergies (ESSCA): results of patch testing the standard series, 2004.
    ESSCA Writing Group
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2008 Feb; 22(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 18211410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Contact dermatitis to white petrolatum.
    Kundu RV; Scheman AJ; Gutmanovich A; Hernandez C
    Skinmed; 2004; 3(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 15365273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Chromated metal products may be hazardous to patients with chromate allergy.
    Geier J; Lessmann H; Hellweg B; Jappe U; Spornraft-Ragaller P; Fuchs T; Aberer W; Frosch PJ; Weisshaar E; Mahler V; Löffler H; Skudlik C; Szliska C; Koch P; Pföhler C; Lilie M; Becker D; Trcka J; Meyer J; Hahn JU; Adam M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Apr; 60(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 19338587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.