146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17442185)
1. [Evaluation of the follow up results of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III after surgical treatment].
Dai ZQ; Pan LY; Huang HF; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 42(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 17442185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Efficacy of complications of different surgical treatments in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III].
Zeng SY; Liang MR; Li LY; Wu YY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 20003783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Conization non in sano].
Lahousen M; Pickel H; Girardi F; Jäger G
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1992; 32 Suppl 1():131. PubMed ID: 1286317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study.
Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia positive cutting edge after conization].
Dai ZQ; Pan LY; Huang HF
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 29(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 17645859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma.
Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Residual and recurrent lesions after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Milojkovic M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Jan; 76(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11818094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Current conservative surgery in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Zarcone R; Bellini P; Cardone G; Raucci F; Mancino T; Voto RI
Minerva Ginecol; 1994 Sep; 46(9):451-4. PubMed ID: 7984322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of clinical evolution in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) treated by cervical conization.
Cardoso FA; Campaner AB; Silva MA
APMIS; 2014 Mar; 122(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 23763281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of stage Ia1 squamous cervical cancer and the importance of excision margins: a retrospective study of long-term outcome after 25 years of follow-up.
Papakonstantinou K; Kyrgiou M; Lyons D; Soutter WP; Ghaem-Maghami S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):625.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24949540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins.
Reich O; Lahousen M; Pickel H; Tamussino K; Winter R
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 11814495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic significance of high-risk HPV persistence after laser CO2 conization for high-grade CIN: a prospective clinical study.
Fallani MG; Penna C; Marchionni M; Bussani C; Pieralli A; Andersson KL; Fambrini M
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2008; 29(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 18714574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature.
Hefler LA; Polterauer S; Schneitter A; Concin N; Hofstetter G; Bentz E; Leipold H; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A
Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization and hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Murta EF; Silva AO; Silva EA
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2006; 27(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 16550969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical analysis of 48 patients with vaginal enlarged amputation of cervix].
Zeng SY; Li LY; Li CX; Shu KY; Pan M; Li HP; Luo B; An YT; Liang MR; Wu YY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 43(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 18366932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resection margins in conization as prognostic marker for relapse in high-grade dysplasia of the uterine cervix in northern Norway: a retrospective long-term follow-up material.
Ørbo A; Arnesen T; Arnes M; Straume B
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 May; 93(2):479-83. PubMed ID: 15099966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
