BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17443154)

  • 1. Moment of reckoning.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2007 Apr; 446(7138):844-5. PubMed ID: 17443154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The problem of new uses.
    Eisenberg RS
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(2):717-39. PubMed ID: 16052897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating drug effects in the post-Vioxx world: there must be a better way.
    Avorn J
    Circulation; 2006 May; 113(18):2173-6. PubMed ID: 16684873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. They are from the government and they really are here to help you.
    Woosley RL
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 48(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 18199889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Drug safety on trial.
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7033):545. PubMed ID: 15800579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical trials in the wake of Vioxx: requiring statistically extreme evidence of benefit to ensure the safety of new drugs.
    Roth-Cline MD
    Circulation; 2006 May; 113(18):2253-9. PubMed ID: 16684875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Communicating with the FDA: the "third rail" of a new model for drug development.
    Stanski DR; Orloff JJ
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 48(2):144-5. PubMed ID: 18199890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Drug safety special: the safety catch.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7033):554-6. PubMed ID: 15800591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What ails the FDA?
    Okie S
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Mar; 352(11):1063-6. PubMed ID: 15784660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Progress and deficiencies in the registration of clinical trials.
    Wood AJ
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Feb; 360(8):824-30. PubMed ID: 19228628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Withdrawal syndrome.
    Nat Med; 2004 Nov; 10(11):1143. PubMed ID: 15516887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trouble at the office.
    Allison M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):967-9. PubMed ID: 18779797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Drug review "behind the curtain": a response to Professor Struve.
    O'Reilly JT
    Cornell Law Rev; 2008 Jul; 93(5):1075-90. PubMed ID: 18618971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What ails the FDA?
    Cohen FJ
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Jun; 352(24):2554. PubMed ID: 15962406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suppressed study raises spectre of flawed drug regulation in US.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2004 Dec; 432(7017):537. PubMed ID: 15577867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical trials performed for the new drug approval process in the United States: standard methods and alternative methods.
    Browne TR
    Epilepsy Res Suppl; 1993; 10():31-44. PubMed ID: 8251105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Drive for drugs leads to baby clinical trials.
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7083):406-7. PubMed ID: 16554774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New clinical trials policy at FDA.
    Vastag B
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1043. PubMed ID: 16964196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Don't blame it all on the bogey.
    Day M
    BMJ; 2007 Jun; 334(7606):1250-1. PubMed ID: 17569929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Epo, by any other name.
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7160):259. PubMed ID: 17882170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.