These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17443612)

  • 21. Postoperative analgesia and vomiting, with special reference to day-case surgery: a systematic review.
    McQuay HJ; Moore RA
    Health Technol Assess; 1998; 2(12):1-236. PubMed ID: 10103349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream as analgesia for hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, controlled, double blinded study.
    Liberty G; Gal M; Halevy-Shalem T; Michaelson-Cohen R; Galoyan N; Hyman J; Eldar-Geva T; Vatashsky E; Margalioth E
    Hum Reprod; 2007 May; 22(5):1335-9. PubMed ID: 17234675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of hyoscine-N-butylbromide on pain perception during and after hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Aboshama RA; Shareef MA; AlAmodi AA; Kurdi W; Al-Tuhaifi MM; Bintalib MG; Sileem SA; Abdelazem O; Abdelhakim AM; Sobh AMA; Elbaradie SMY
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2022 Jul; 25(3):422-429. PubMed ID: 33140669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. NSAIDS or paracetamol, alone or combined with opioids, for cancer pain.
    McNicol E; Strassels SA; Goudas L; Lau J; Carr DB
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Jan; (1):CD005180. PubMed ID: 15654708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of education and counselling on reducing pain and anxiety in women undergoing hysterosalpingography: A randomised controlled trial.
    Guvenc G; Bektas Pardes B; Kinci MF; Karasahin KE
    J Clin Nurs; 2020 May; 29(9-10):1653-1661. PubMed ID: 31889350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Preoperative analgesics for additional pain relief in children and adolescents having dental treatment.
    Ashley PF; Parekh S; Moles DR; Anand P; Behbehani A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD008392. PubMed ID: 22972120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Oil-based versus water-based contrast media for hysterosalpingography in infertile women of advanced age, with ovulation disorders or a high risk for tubal pathology: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (H2Oil2 study).
    Rosielle K; Kamphuis D; van Welie N; Roest I; Mozes A; van Santbrink EJP; van de Laar T; Hooker AB; Huppelschoten AG; Li W; Bongers MY; Stoker J; van Wely M; Koks C; Lambalk CB; Hemingway A; Mol BWJ; Dreyer K; Mijatovic V
    BMC Womens Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):123. PubMed ID: 35436944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Randomized controlled trial of benzocaine versus placebo spray for pain relief at hysterosalpingogram.
    Bachman EA; Senapati S; Sammel MD; Kalra SK
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Jun; 28(6):748-52. PubMed ID: 24745839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Caudal epidural block versus other methods of postoperative pain relief for circumcision in boys.
    Allan CY; Jacqueline PA; Shubhda JH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (2):CD003005. PubMed ID: 12804449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hysterosalpingosonography for diagnosing tubal occlusion in subfertile women: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Maheux-Lacroix S; Boutin A; Moore L; Bergeron ME; Bujold E; Laberge P; Lemyre M; Dodin S
    Hum Reprod; 2014 May; 29(5):953-63. PubMed ID: 24578476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour.
    Anim-Somuah M; Smyth R; Howell C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD000331. PubMed ID: 16235275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can the addition of a paracervical block to systemic or local analgesics improve the pain perceived by the patient during hysterosalpingography?
    Hacivelioglu S; Gencer M; Cakir Gungor A; Kosar S; Koc E; Cosar E
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jan; 34(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 24359050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors influencing the severity of pain during hysterosalpingography.
    Szymusik I; Grzechocińska B; Marianowski P; Kaczyński B; Wielgoś M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 May; 129(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 25650318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effectiveness of interventions for pain relief in hysterosalpingographyAnetwork meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Guo X; Tan Z
    Pak J Med Sci; 2017; 33(4):1029-1035. PubMed ID: 29067087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of midazolam and dexmedetomidine for pain relief during and after hysterosalpingography in women with infertility.
    Safi F; Rabiee L; Shokrpour M; Kamali A
    J Med Life; 2019; 12(2):173-177. PubMed ID: 31406520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation and perspectives on hysterosalpingography (HSG) procedure in infertility: a comprehensive study.
    Canday M; Yurtkal A; Kirat S
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Aug; 27(15):7107-7117. PubMed ID: 37606121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analgesia for Office Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    De Silva PM; Mahmud A; Smith PP; Clark TJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(5):1034-1047. PubMed ID: 31982584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of intramuscular hyoscine-n-butyl bromide on fallopian tube spasm and pain perception during and after hysterosalpingography in infertile women: A randomized single-blind controlled clinical trial.
    Safi F; Kamali A; Rezaei M; Rezaei M; Rafiei M
    Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2019; 33():31. PubMed ID: 31456955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The therapeutic effect of hysterosalpingography in couples with unexplained subfertility: a post-hoc analysis of a prospective multi-centre cohort study.
    Dreyer K; van Eekelen R; Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; van der Steeg JW; Steures P; Eijkemans M; van der Veen F; Hompes P; Mol B; van Geloven N
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 Feb; 38(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 30579824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The long-term costs and effects of tubal flushing with oil-based versus water-based contrast during hysterosalpingography.
    van Welie N; Pham CT; van Rijswijk J; Dreyer K; Verhoeve HR; Hoek A; de Bruin JP; Nap AW; van Hooff MHA; Goddijn M; Hooker AB; Gijsen AP; Traas MAF; Smeenk JMJ; Sluijmer AV; Lambers MJ; van Unnik GA; de Koning CH; Mozes A; Timmerman CCM; Lambalk CB; Karnon JD; Mijatovic V; Mol BWJ;
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 Jan; 42(1):150-157. PubMed ID: 33077355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.