These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17444783)

  • 1. Basket design as a factor in retention and release of calculi in vitro.
    Zeltser IS; Bagley DH
    J Endourol; 2007 Mar; 21(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 17444783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retrieval and releasing capabilities of stone-basket designs in vitro.
    Chenven ES; Bagley DH
    J Endourol; 2005 Mar; 19(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 15798419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrieval capabilities of different stone basket designs in vitro.
    el-Gabry EA; Bagley DH
    J Endourol; 1999 May; 13(4):305-7. PubMed ID: 10405911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of nitinol tipless stone baskets in an in vitro caliceal model.
    Lukasewycz S; Skenazy J; Hoffman N; Kuskowski M; Hendlin K; Monga M
    J Urol; 2004 Aug; 172(2):562-4. PubMed ID: 15247730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of small diameter stone baskets in an in vitro caliceal and ureteral model.
    Korman E; Hendlin K; Chotikawanich E; Monga M
    J Endourol; 2011 Jan; 25(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 20977371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of tipless and helical baskets in an in vitro ureteral model.
    Lukasewycz S; Hoffman N; Botnaru A; Deka PM; Monga M
    Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):435-8; discussion 438. PubMed ID: 15351559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tipless Nitinol Stone Baskets: Comparison of Penetration Force, Radial Dilation Force, Opening Dynamics, and Deflection.
    Patel N; Akhavein A; Hinck B; Jain R; Monga M
    Urology; 2017 May; 103():256-260. PubMed ID: 28104422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative investigations on the retrieval capabilities of various baskets and graspers in four ex vivo models.
    Ptashnyk T; Cueva-Martinez A; Michel MS; Alken P; Köhrmann KU
    Eur Urol; 2002 Apr; 41(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 12074812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of a new tipless nitinol stone basket and comparison with an existing flat-wire basket.
    Honey RJ
    J Endourol; 1998 Dec; 12(6):529-31. PubMed ID: 9895257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Practical comparison of four nitinol stone baskets.
    Blew BD; Dagnone AJ; Fazio LM; Pace KT; Honey RJ
    J Endourol; 2007 Jun; 21(6):655-8. PubMed ID: 17638565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Implementation of a scale on stone baskets].
    Cordes J; Nguyen F; Pinkowski W; Jocham D
    Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 24902071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Small-diameter nitinol stone baskets: radial dilation force and dynamics of opening.
    Korman E; Hendlin K; Monga M
    J Endourol; 2011 Sep; 25(9):1537-40. PubMed ID: 21438676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radial dilation force of tipless and helical stone baskets.
    Hendlin K; Lee C; Anderson JK; Monga M
    J Endourol; 2004 Dec; 18(10):946-7. PubMed ID: 15801359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a new multi-basket load-release ureteral stent.
    Pierre SA; Bamberger M; Choi B; Albala D
    J Endourol; 2008 Apr; 22(4):831-4. PubMed ID: 18419225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Percutaneous renal stone extraction: in vitro study of retrieval devices.
    Hoffman N; Lukasewycz SJ; Canales B; Botnaru A; Slaton JW; Monga M
    J Urol; 2004 Aug; 172(2):559-61. PubMed ID: 15247729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro comparison of prototype magnetic tool with conventional nitinol basket for ureteroscopic retrieval of stone fragments rendered paramagnetic with iron oxide microparticles.
    Tan YK; McLeroy SL; Faddegon S; Olweny E; Fernandez R; Beardsley H; Gnade B; Park S; Pearle MS; Cadeddu JA
    J Urol; 2012 Aug; 188(2):648-52. PubMed ID: 22704446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel stone retrieval basket for more efficient lithotripsy procedures.
    Salimi N; Mahajan A; Don J; Schwartz B
    J Med Eng Technol; 2009; 33(2):142-50. PubMed ID: 19085204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preclinical Testing of a Combination Stone Basket and Ureteral Balloon to Extract Ureteral Stones.
    Massoudi R; Metzner TJ; Bonneau B; Ngo TC; Shinghal R; Leppert JT
    J Endourol; 2018 Feb; 32(2):96-99. PubMed ID: 29216731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic evaluation of stone basket dimensions.
    Monga M; Hendlin K; Lee C; Anderson JK
    Urology; 2004 Jun; 63(6):1042-4. PubMed ID: 15183944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The broken stone basket: configuration and technique for removal.
    Gallentine ML; Bishoff JT; Harmon WJ
    J Endourol; 2001 Nov; 15(9):911-4. PubMed ID: 11769845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.