These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17444920)

  • 21. Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli.
    Westfall J; Kenny DA; Judd CM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Oct; 143(5):2020-45. PubMed ID: 25111580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence.
    Cribbie RA; Gruman JA; Arpin-Cribbie CA
    J Clin Psychol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14692005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Planning significant and meaningful research in exercise science: estimating sample size.
    Thomas JR; Lochbaum MR; Landers DM; He C
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1997 Mar; 68(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 9094761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing Alternative Corrections for Bias in the Bias-Corrected Bootstrap Test of Mediation.
    Chen D; Fritz MS
    Eval Health Prof; 2021 Dec; 44(4):416-427. PubMed ID: 34142575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Small sample mediation testing: misplaced confidence in bootstrapped confidence intervals.
    Koopman J; Howe M; Hollenbeck JR; Sin HP
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Jan; 100(1):194-202. PubMed ID: 24731180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue.
    Enders CK; Tofighi D
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 17563168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statistical power and effect sizes of clinical neuropsychology research.
    Bezeau S; Graves R
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Jun; 23(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 11419453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs.
    Olejnik S; Algina J
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):434-47. PubMed ID: 14664681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mediation analysis: a retrospective snapshot of practice and more recent directions.
    Gelfand LA; Mensinger JL; Tenhave T
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Apr; 136(2):153-76. PubMed ID: 19350833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science.
    Francis G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Oct; 21(5):1180-7. PubMed ID: 24638826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimal sample sizes for Welch's test under various allocation and cost considerations.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):1014-22. PubMed ID: 21512873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Statistical power in partially nested designs probing multilevel mediation.
    Kelcey B; Bai F; Xie Y
    Psychother Res; 2020 Nov; 30(8):1061-1074. PubMed ID: 32036780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Counterfactual graphical models for longitudinal mediation analysis with unobserved confounding.
    Shpitser I
    Cogn Sci; 2013 Aug; 37(6):1011-35. PubMed ID: 23899340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect sizes for experimenting psychologists.
    Rosnow RL
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Sep; 57(3):221-37. PubMed ID: 14596479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Average causal effects from nonrandomized studies: a practical guide and simulated example.
    Schafer JL; Kang J
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Dec; 13(4):279-313. PubMed ID: 19071996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative appraisal of two equivalence tests for multiple standardized effects.
    Shieh G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():110-7. PubMed ID: 26777779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exact calculation of power and sample size in bioequivalence studies using two one-sided tests.
    Shen M; Russek-Cohen E; Slud EV
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 25477145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sample size for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Wei C; Li J; Bumgarner RE
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Nov; 5():87. PubMed ID: 15533245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Alpha values as a function of sample size, effect size, and power: accuracy over inference.
    Bradley MT; Brand A
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Jun; 112(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 24245076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 58.