201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17445021)
41. Adjusting weighted kappa for severity of mistriage decreases reported reliability of emergency department triage systems: a comparative study.
van der Wulp I; van Stel HF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 62(11):1196-201. PubMed ID: 19398298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Interrater agreement between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center.
Gravel J; Gouin S; Manzano S; Arsenault M; Amre D
Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1262-7. PubMed ID: 18945238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Working with Manchester triage -- job satisfaction in nursing.
Forsgren S; Forsman B; Carlström ED
Int Emerg Nurs; 2009 Oct; 17(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 19782334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The vexatious vital: neither clinical measurements by nurses nor an electronic monitor provides accurate measurements of respiratory rate in triage.
Lovett PB; Buchwald JM; Stürmann K; Bijur P
Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Jan; 45(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 15635313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Triage with the French Emergency Nurses Classification in Hospital scale: reliability and validity.
Taboulet P; Moreira V; Haas L; Porcher R; Braganca A; Fontaine JP; Poncet MC
Eur J Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 16(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 19194114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Design, application and testing of the Work Observation Method by Activity Timing (WOMBAT) to measure clinicians' patterns of work and communication.
Westbrook JI; Ampt A
Int J Med Inform; 2009 Apr; 78 Suppl 1():S25-33. PubMed ID: 18951838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The challenges for nurses communicating with and gaining valid consent from adults with intellectual disabilities within the accident and emergency care service.
Sowney M; Barr O
J Clin Nurs; 2007 Sep; 16(9):1678-86. PubMed ID: 17459128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Nurses' accuracy and self-perceived ability using the Emergency Severity Index triage tool: a cross-sectional study in four Swiss hospitals.
Jordi K; Grossmann F; Gaddis GM; Cignacco E; Denhaerynck K; Schwendimann R; Nickel CH
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2015 Aug; 23():62. PubMed ID: 26310569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Reliability and accuracy of the South African Triage Scale when used by nurses in the emergency department of Timergara Hospital, Pakistan.
Dalwai MK; Twomey M; Maikere J; Said S; Wakeel M; Jemmy JP; Valles P; Tayler-Smith K; Wallis L; Zachariah R
S Afr Med J; 2014 Mar; 104(5):372-5. PubMed ID: 25212207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Graduate nurses' lived experience of in-hospital resuscitation: a hermeneutic phenomenological approach.
Ranse J; Arbon P
Aust Crit Care; 2008 Feb; 21(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 18206382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Interrater agreement: a comparison between two emergency department triage scales.
Göransson KE; von Rosen A
Eur J Emerg Med; 2011 Apr; 18(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 20679900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reliability and validity of an Italian four-level emergency triage system.
Parenti N; Manfredi R; Bacchi Reggiani ML; Sangiorgi D; Lenzi T
Emerg Med J; 2010 Jul; 27(7):495-8. PubMed ID: 20584948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The Australasian Triage Scale: examining emergency department nurses' performance using computer and paper scenarios.
Considine J; LeVasseur SA; Villanueva E
Ann Emerg Med; 2004 Nov; 44(5):516-23. PubMed ID: 15520712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A comparison of novice and expert nurses' cue collection during clinical decision-making: verbal protocol analysis.
Hoffman KA; Aitken LM; Duffield C
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1335-44. PubMed ID: 19555954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A review of the quality assurance processes for the Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) and implications for future practice.
Hodge A; Hugman A; Varndell W; Howes K
Australas Emerg Nurs J; 2013 Feb; 16(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 23622553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Reliability and validity of two four-level emergency triage systems.
Parenti N; Ferrara L; Bacchi Reggiani ML; Sangiorgi D; Lenzi T
Eur J Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 16(3):115-20. PubMed ID: 19282762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Calculating kappas from adjusted data improved the comparability of the reliability of triage systems: a comparative study.
van der Wulp I; van Stel HF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1256-63. PubMed ID: 20430580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Accuracy and interrater reliability of paediatric emergency department triage.
Allen AR; Spittal MJ; Nicolas C; Oakley E; Freed GL
Emerg Med Australas; 2015 Oct; 27(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 26268051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The Emergency Triage Education Kit: improving paediatric triage.
Malyon L; Williams A; Ware RS
Australas Emerg Nurs J; 2014 May; 17(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 24815203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Assessing confidence in triage decision making: evaluation of an inventory in a sample of navy and civilian nurses.
Smith AJ
J Nurses Staff Dev; 2012; 28(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22617784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
