BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17445509)

  • 1. Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops.
    Raybould A
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 17445509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The bucket and the searchlight: formulating and testing risk hypotheses about the weediness and invasiveness potential of transgenic crops.
    Raybould A
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2010; 9(3):123-33. PubMed ID: 21975253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing uncertainty in regulatory decision-making for transgenic crops: more ecological research or clearer environmental risk assessment?
    Raybould A
    GM Crops; 2010; 1(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 21912209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods.
    Romeis J; Bartsch D; Bigler F; Candolfi MP; Gielkens MM; Hartley SE; Hellmich RL; Huesing JE; Jepson PC; Layton R; Quemada H; Raybould A; Rose RI; Schiemann J; Sears MK; Shelton AM; Sweet J; Vaituzis Z; Wolt JD
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18259178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants.
    Andow DA; Zwahlen C
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):196-214. PubMed ID: 16958885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How does scientific risk assessment of GM crops fit within the wider risk analysis?
    Johnson KL; Raybould AF; Hudson MD; Poppy GM
    Trends Plant Sci; 2007 Jan; 12(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17161972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Japanese experience with the Blue Book and subsequent activities in environmental biosafety of GM crops.
    Hayashi K
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):237-8. PubMed ID: 17640516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Crop improvement using small RNAs: applications and predictive ecological risk assessments.
    Auer C; Frederick R
    Trends Biotechnol; 2009 Nov; 27(11):644-51. PubMed ID: 19796832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Genetically modified crops: promises and good intentions are not enough (refutation to Espinoza et aL 2004, Rev. Biol. Trop. 52 (3): 727-732)].
    García JE
    Rev Biol Trop; 2007 Jun; 55(2):347-64. PubMed ID: 19069750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design and management of field trials of transgenic cereals.
    Bedo Z; Rakszegi M; Láng L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 478():305-14. PubMed ID: 19009453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetically modified crops and allergenicity.
    Metcalfe DD
    Nat Immunol; 2005 Sep; 6(9):857-60. PubMed ID: 16116460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: ten years of field research and commercial cultivation.
    Sanvido O; Romeis J; Bigler F
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():235-78. PubMed ID: 17522828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reassessing the environmental risks of GM crops.
    Firbank L; Lonsdale M; Poppy G
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Dec; 23(12):1475-6. PubMed ID: 16333281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Swedish farmers attitudes, expectations and fears in relation to growing genetically modified crops.
    Lehrman A; Johnson K
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2008; 7(3):153-62. PubMed ID: 18801325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using problem formulation to clarify the meaning of weight of evidence and biological relevance in environmental risk assessments for genetically modified crops.
    Raybould A; Holt K; Kimber I
    GM Crops Food; 2019; 10(2):63-76. PubMed ID: 31184249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Information tools for environmental risk assessment of low level presence - an introduction to the reviews of the environmental safety of proteins used in genetically engineered plants.
    Roberts A
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2011; 10(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 22541882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Basic framework for risk assessment for transgenic plants developed by the OECD: 20 years after the OECD "Blue Book".
    Bergmans H
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 17640511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Altered pesticide use on transgenic crops and the associated general impact from an environmental perspective.
    Kleter GA; Bhula R; Bodnaruk K; Carazo E; Felsot AS; Harris CA; Katayama A; Kuiper HA; Racke KD; Rubin B; Shevah Y; Stephenson GR; Tanaka K; Unsworth J; Wauchope RD; Wong SS
    Pest Manag Sci; 2007 Nov; 63(11):1107-15. PubMed ID: 17880042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops--what makes sense?
    Goodman RE; Vieths S; Sampson HA; Hill D; Ebisawa M; Taylor SL; van Ree R
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18183024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.