These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17446569)

  • 1. The Sacramento Dependency Drug Court: development and outcomes.
    Boles SM; Young NK; Moore T; DiPirro-Beard S
    Child Maltreat; 2007 May; 12(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 17446569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Juvenile drug courts: emerging outcomes and key research issues.
    Henggeler SW
    Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2007 May; 20(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 17415076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How effective are family treatment drug courts? Outcomes from a four-site national study.
    Green BL; Furrer C; Worcel S; Burrus S; Finigan MW
    Child Maltreat; 2007 Feb; 12(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 17218647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are effective drug courts an urban phenomenon?: considering their impact on recidivism among a nonmetropolitan adult sample in Washington State.
    Galloway AL; Drapela LA
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2006 Jun; 50(3):280-93. PubMed ID: 16648383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public health nurse interventions for women in a dependency drug court.
    Somervell AM; Saylor C; Mao CL
    Public Health Nurs; 2005; 22(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 15670326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are judicial status hearings a "key component" of drug court? Six and twelve months outcomes.
    Marlowe DB; Festinger DS; Dugosh KL; Lee PA
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2005 Aug; 79(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 16002024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drug court effectiveness: a review of California evaluation reports, 1995-1999.
    Guydish J; Wolfe E; Tajima B; Woods WJ
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2001; 33(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 11824696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of short-term treatment outcomes among California's Proposition 36 participants.
    Hser YI; Evans E; Teruya C; Huang D; Anglin MD
    Eval Program Plann; 2007 May; 30(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 17689324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lifting the cover on drug courts: evaluation findings and policy concerns.
    Sanford JS; Arrigo BA
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2005 Jun; 49(3):239-59. PubMed ID: 15851506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining the Relationships between Family Drug Court Program Compliance and Child Welfare Outcomes.
    Child H; McIntyre D
    Child Welfare; 2015; 94(5):67-87. PubMed ID: 26827465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of community-based treatment for substance-abusing adolescents: 12-month outcomes of youths entering phoenix academy or alternative probation dispositions.
    Morral AR; McCaffrey DF; Ridgeway G
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2004 Sep; 18(3):257-68. PubMed ID: 15482081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drug treatment court of Vancouver: an empirical evaluation of recidivism.
    Somers JM; Currie L; Moniruzzaman A; Eiboff F; Patterson M
    Int J Drug Policy; 2012 Sep; 23(5):393-400. PubMed ID: 22421552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patients' abstinence status affects the benefits of 12-step self-help group participation on substance use disorder outcomes.
    McKellar JD; Harris AH; Moos RH
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2009 Jan; 99(1-3):115-22. PubMed ID: 18778901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drug court treatment for methamphetamine dependence: treatment response and posttreatment outcomes.
    Marinelli-Casey P; Gonzales R; Hillhouse M; Ang A; Zweben J; Cohen J; Hora PF; Rawson RA;
    J Subst Abuse Treat; 2008 Mar; 34(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 17596903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impacts of family treatment drug court on child welfare core outcomes: A meta-analysis.
    Zhang S; Huang H; Wu Q; Li Y; Liu M
    Child Abuse Negl; 2019 Feb; 88():1-14. PubMed ID: 30412783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Drug treatment courts are popular but do they work and are they ethical and appropriate for Canada?
    Christie T; Anderson JF
    Health Law Can; 2003 May; 23(4):70-9. PubMed ID: 12845932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Practice and evaluation of group work programs for families with drug dependent people].
    Nishikawa K
    Nihon Arukoru Yakubutsu Igakkai Zasshi; 2007 Dec; 42(6):635-58. PubMed ID: 18240652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of a mixed-gender aftercare program for substance abuse: decomposing measured and unmeasured gender differences.
    Yeom HS; Shepard DS
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2007 Dec; 10(4):207-19. PubMed ID: 18166831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of a family treatment court on child permanency and safety.
    Mersky JP; Lee CP; Liu X; Janczewski CE
    Child Abuse Negl; 2023 Dec; 146():106512. PubMed ID: 37866252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized controlled trial of intensive referral to 12-step self-help groups: one-year outcomes.
    Timko C; DeBenedetti A
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2007 Oct; 90(2-3):270-9. PubMed ID: 17524574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.